



| Name / Designation | GQM-163A Coyote |
| Type / Role | Supersonic Aerial Target Missile |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Manufacturer | Northrop Grumman |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | 2005 |
| Operational Status | Active |
| Range | Approximately 100 km |
| Speed | Mach 2.5+ |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | Low-altitude sea-skimming flight, variable mission profiles |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Not applicable (target missile) |
| Warhead Type | Instrumented Target Payload (No Combat Warhead) |
| Guidance System | GPS / INS |
| Targeting Mode | Pre-programmed Autonomous Flight |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | Ground Launcher |
| Seeker Type | Not Applicable |
| Length | Approximately 5.5 m |
| Diameter | Approximately 0.35 m |
| Wingspan | Approximately 0.91 m |
| Launch Weight | Approximately 900 kg |
| Propulsion | Solid Rocket Booster and Ramjet Sustainer |
| Warhead Weight | None (Target Payload) |
| Explosive Type | Not Applicable |
| Detonation Mechanism | Not Applicable |
| Payload Options | Telemetry, Flight Data Recording, Scoring Systems |
| Operational Range Type | Medium Range |
| Deployment Platform | Ground |
| Target Types | Simulated Anti-Ship Cruise Missile Threats |
| Combat Proven | No (Training and Testing System) |
| Users / Operators | United States Navy |
The GQM-163A Coyote is a high-speed aerial target missile developed to simulate modern anti-ship cruise missile threats for U.S. Navy training and weapons testing. Designed to replicate the flight characteristics of sea-skimming supersonic missiles, the GQM-163A enables naval forces to evaluate shipboard air defense systems under realistic combat conditions.
Unlike operational strike missiles, the Coyote serves as a target vehicle, helping validate radar performance, missile interceptors, and fleet readiness against advanced missile threats. Its ability to fly at very low altitudes over water while maintaining supersonic speeds makes it one of the most capable target systems in service today.
The GQM-163A was developed and manufactured by Northrop Grumman in the United States. The program was created to replace older target systems and provide a more realistic representation of emerging anti-ship missile threats encountered by modern naval forces.
The missile entered operational service in the mid-2000s and continues to support U.S. Navy weapons testing, missile defense exercises, and fleet training operations.
One of the defining features of the GQM-163A is its impressive speed. Powered by a solid-fuel booster and a sustainment ramjet engine, the missile can reach speeds exceeding Mach 2.5, while maintaining low-altitude sea-skimming flight profiles.
The target missile has an operational range of approximately 100 kilometers (62 miles), allowing it to conduct realistic threat simulations over extended distances. Its advanced flight control system can execute complex maneuvers and attack profiles that challenge modern naval air defense networks.
Exact unit pricing varies depending on configuration, support equipment, and contract terms. Industry estimates place the cost of a single GQM-163A target missile at approximately $1 million to $2 million per unit, with additional expenses associated with launch support, telemetry systems, and mission operations.
The system remains a critical asset for U.S. Navy missile defense testing and readiness evaluation programs.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this websiteโs content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More