1. Home
2. Catalog 
3. Compare 
4. JF-17 Thunder vs Tejas Mk-2: In-Depth Comparison of Specs, Capabilities & Performance

JF-17 Thunder vs Tejas Mk-2: In-Depth Comparison of Specs, Capabilities & Performance

	JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet Tejas Mk‑2 Fighter Jet
Price
Our Rating	8.4 7.8
Manufacturer	PAC - Pakistan Aeronautical Complex Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)
Category	Fighter Jets Fighter Jets

General Information

Name	JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 Xiaolong Tejas Mk‑2 / Medium Weight Fighter (MWF)
Manufacturer	Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC) & Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group (CAIG) Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), ADA/DRDO
Country of Origin	Pakistan / China India
Type / Role	Multirole Fighter Multirole fighter / Medium-weight combat aircraft
Generation	4.5th 4.5th Generation
Status	Active Service Prototype development
First Flight	August 25, 2003 Projected 2025–2026
Introduction / In Service Since	2010 Expected post-2028
Number Built	175+ units Prototype stage
Operators	Pakistan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Azerbaijan Intended: Indian Air Force

Dimensions & Structure

Length	14.33 m (47 ft) ~14.65 m
Wingspan	9.44 m (31 ft) ~8.5 m
Height	4.57 m (15 ft) ~4.86 m
Wing Area	24.4 m² (263 sq ft) ~38.4 m²
Empty Weight	6,586 kg (14,520 lbs) ~7,000 kg
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)	13,500 kg (29,762 lbs) ~17,500 kg
Internal Weapons Bay	None None
External Hardpoints	8 (including wingtip rails) 11

Performance

Maximum Speed	Mach 1.8 (1,910 km/h / 1,187 mph) Mach 1.8
Range	3,482 km (2,164 mi) with external drop tanks ~1,500 km+
Combat Radius	900 km (560 mi) on internal fuel ~1,000 km
Service Ceiling	16,916 m (55,500 ft) ~50,000 ft
Rate of Climb	300 m/s (59,000 ft/min) Not publicly disclosed
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio	1.07 (with full afterburner) ~0.56 (based on F414 thrust & MTOW)
G Limits	+8 / -3 +9 / –3.2

Powerplant

Engine Type	Klimov RD-93MA afterburning turbofan GE F414-INS6 turbofan
No. of Engines	1 1
Thrust (each)	50.4 kN dry / 91.2 kN with afterburner ~98 kN
Thrust Vectoring	No No
Fuel Capacity	2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) internal Increased over Mk‑1 (exact liters undisclosed)

Armament

Gun	1 × 23 mm GSh-23-2 twin-barrel autocannon Internal cannon (specific model undisclosed)
Missiles (Air-to-Air)	PL-5E, PL-10, PL-12, PL-15E (BVR) Astra BVR, short-range IR missiles
Missiles (Air-to-Ground)	Ra'ad ALCM, CM-400AKG, C-802AK Anti-Ship Spice, SCALP-style standoff, Rudram anti-radiation
Bombs	LT-2 (Laser-guided), LS-6 (GPS-guided), Mk-82/84 Conventional and precision-guided bombs
Hardpoints	8 11 external stations
Payload Capacity	3,600 kg (7,936 lbs) ~6,500 kg

Avionics & Systems

Radar	KLJ-7A Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) Uttam AESA radar (indigenous)
Radar Range	160–170 km (against fighter-sized target) Not publicly disclosed
Electronic Warfare (EW) System	Integrated digital EW suite & Missile Approach Warning System Integrated EW suite
Targeting System	Aselsan ASELPOD / WMD-7 targeting pods Multi-role precision targeting
Helmet Display	Helmet-Mounted Display and Sight (HMD/S) Large-area HUD & touchscreen cockpit displays
Navigation	INS + GPS/Beidou satellite navigation INS / digital navigation systems
Autopilot / AI Assistance	Three-axis digital Fly-By-Wire (FBW) system Digital flight control computer
Communication	Secure, jam-resistant tactical data link Secure multi-band comms (likely)

Stealth & Technology

Radar Cross Section (RCS)	Reduced frontal RCS compared to older blocks Reduced via airframe design
Stealth Features	Radar-absorbent material coatings & minor airframe shaping Canards, twisted intakes, composites
Infrared Signature Reduction	Limited Standard reduction measures
Sensor Fusion	Partial multi-sensor architecture Radar, IRST, EW integrated
Networking Capabilities	Real-time command data sharing with ground/AWACS Network-centric enabled; future upgrades possible

Variants

Special Export Versions

JF-17N (Nigeria) – customized avionics and weapon suite; JF-17M (Myanmar) – tailored for local integration; JF-17E (Export) – export-optimized with optional Western avionics and weapon compatibility. Potential export-customized version

Operational History

Major Conflicts / Deployments	Operation Swift Retort (2019), Counter-insurgency ops None (prototype stage)
Notable Operators	Pakistan Air Force, Azerbaijan Air Force Intended: Indian Air Force
Combat Proven?	Yes No
Mission Types	Air Defense, Interdiction, Close Air Support, Anti-Ship Strike Air dominance, ground strike, precision attack

Cost & Program

Unit Cost	$25 million – $35 million (estimated variant dependent) Not publicly disclosed; cost-effective vs imported jets
Development Cost	$500 million (jointly shared initial program) Approx. ₹6,500 crore additional funding approved
Program Name	Super-7 / JF-17 Thunder Program LCA Tejas Mk‑2 / Medium Weight Fighter
Funding Countries	Pakistan and China India (domestic)

Additional Information

Upgrades Planned	Enhanced software integration and localized missile adaptations. Advanced avionics, weapons, networking
Future Replacement	Project AZM Next-Gen Fighter / Fifth-Gen acquisitions. May lead to Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA)
Export Restrictions	Subject to joint approval by Pakistan and China. Subject to Indian export controls
Notable Achievements	Successful integration of true long-range PL-15E BVR system. ~70–80% indigenous content, modular architecture
Competitors	HAL Tejas (India), JAS 39 Gripen (Sweden), F-16 Fighting Falcon (USA) Saab Gripen E, Dassault Mirage 2000, F‑16, other medium fighters

Disclaimer Note

The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.