

| Name / Designation | Extended Range Attack Munition (ERAM) |
| Type / Role | Air-launched standoff cruise missile, precision strike |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Manufacturer | Zone 5 Technologies, CoAspire |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | Expected late 2026 |
| Operational Status | In testing / Low-rate production |
| Range | 150โ280 miles (240โ450 km) |
| Speed | Mach 0.6 (approx. 430โ460 mph) |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | Optimized for high-altitude release |
| Accuracy (CEP) | <10 meters |
| Warhead Type | Blast-fragmentation with penetration |
| Guidance System | GPS / INS |
| Targeting Mode | Fire-and-forget / Precision autonomous |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | Fighter jets (F-16 and compatible platforms) |
| Seeker Type | Multi-mode with inertial and satellite navigation |
| Length | Not publicly disclosed |
| Diameter | Not publicly disclosed |
| Wingspan | Not publicly disclosed |
| Launch Weight | Approx. 500โ800 lb class |
| Propulsion | Turbojet / Turbofan engine |
| Warhead Weight | Approx. 500 lb (227 kg) |
| Explosive Type | Blast-fragmentation / Penetrator |
| Detonation Mechanism | Multi-mode fuse |
| Payload Options | Conventional high-explosive |
| Operational Range Type | Medium to Long |
| Deployment Platform | Air |
| Target Types | Fixed targets, air defenses, logistics hubs |
| Combat Proven | No (in testing phase) |
| Users / Operators | United States, Ukraine (planned) |
The Extended Range Attack Munition (ERAM) represents a new generation of affordable, air-launched precision standoff weapons developed by the U.S. Air Force. Designed as a hybrid between a cruise missile and an advanced guided bomb, ERAM addresses the need for high-volume, cost-effective long-range strike capability in contested environments. Launched from fighter aircraft such as the F-16, it enables operators to engage fixed and mobile high-value targets—including command centers, air defense systems, supply depots, and bridges—from beyond the reach of most enemy air defenses. Development began in 2024 with a focus on rapid prototyping and manufacturability, achieving live-warhead testing in early 2026.
ERAM is developed under U.S. Air Force contracts by non-traditional defense firms Zone 5 Technologies and CoAspire. These companies were selected to accelerate production using commercial-off-the-shelf components where possible, supporting scalable manufacturing for U.S. forces and key allies like Ukraine.
ERAM achieves subsonic speeds of approximately Mach 0.6 (around 430-460 mph) using a compact turbojet or turbofan engine. Its operational range extends from 150 to 280 miles (240-450 km), depending on launch altitude and flight profile. High-altitude releases maximize range through reduced drag and extended glide phases. Accuracy is reported with a CEP under 10 meters, supported by GPS/INS guidance with jamming resistance.
ERAM is engineered for affordability, with unit costs targeted significantly lower than legacy cruise missiles like JASSM. This enables procurement in large quantities—thousands of units—for sustained operations, making it ideal for high-intensity conflicts requiring massed precision effects.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this websiteโs content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More