

| Name / Designation | Barracuda 500M (AGM-189A) |
| Type / Role | Long-range subsonic cruise missile, precision standoff strike / loitering munition |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Manufacturer | Anduril Industries |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | In production / Entering service ~2027 |
| Operational Status | Active / In production |
| Range | >500 nautical miles (930+ km) |
| Speed | High subsonic (~Mach 0.74 / 180โ500 knots) |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | Not publicly detailed (typical cruise altitudes for survivability) |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Precision strike capability (meter-class with advanced guidance) |
| Warhead Type | Conventional high-explosive / modular payload |
| Guidance System | Autonomous, GPS/INS, resilient navigation |
| Targeting Mode | Fire-and-forget / collaborative autonomy |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | Aircraft (F-15, F-16, F-35, C-130, etc.), ground launchers, containerized |
| Seeker Type | Multi-mode / software-defined |
| Length | Not publicly detailed (family scaling) |
| Diameter | Compact design for internal carriage |
| Wingspan | Folding wings for platform compatibility |
| Launch Weight | Approximately 500 lb class |
| Propulsion | Turbojet with booster |
| Warhead Weight | ~100 lb (45 kg) |
| Explosive Type | Conventional HE / modular |
| Detonation Mechanism | Programmable impact / proximity |
| Payload Options | Strike, EW, decoy variants |
| Operational Range Type | Long |
| Deployment Platform | Air, Ground, Sea-compatible |
| Target Types | Land targets, maritime vessels, defended infrastructure |
| Combat Proven | No (in advanced testing / production) |
| Users / Operators | United States (U.S. Army primary), future allies |
The Barracuda 500M represents a new generation of affordable, long-range precision munitions developed to address evolving threats in contested environments. As part of Anduril Industries’ Barracuda family of Autonomous Air Vehicles (AAVs), the 500M variant functions as a turbojet-powered cruise missile optimized for high-volume production and flexible deployment. It bridges the gap between low-cost attritable systems and high-end standoff weapons, enabling U.S. forces to conduct massed strikes against land and maritime targets while maintaining operational tempo in high-threat scenarios.
Anduril Industries, a U.S.-based defense technology company headquartered in California, designs and produces the Barracuda 500M. The system emphasizes software-defined autonomy, modular construction, and rapid digital manufacturing to achieve low unit costs and scalable output. It has secured major U.S. Department of Defense contracts, including production agreements for thousands of units for the U.S. Army.
The Barracuda 500M achieves a range exceeding 500 nautical miles (approximately 930 km) with cruise speeds in the 180–500 knots range (high subsonic, around Mach 0.74). Powered by a turbojet engine following booster-assisted launch, it supports extended loiter times and adaptable flight profiles for complex missions.
Unit costs are reported around $200,000–$216,000, significantly lower than legacy cruise missiles like the Tomahawk. This affordability supports mass employment strategies and high-volume salvo attacks.
The missile features modular payloads, resilient navigation, and integration with autonomous systems for collaborative operations, including strike, jamming, or decoy roles. It is compatible with air, ground, and potentially naval launch platforms, including containerized systems holding multiple rounds.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this websiteโs content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More