- Home
- Defense Systems
- Compare
Su-35 Flanker-E Fighter Jet vs SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter
General Information
|
Name
|
Su-35 Flanker-E
Su-57 Felon
|
|
Manufacturer
|
Sukhoi (United Aircraft Corporation)
Sukhoi (UAC)
|
|
Country of Origin
|
Russia
Russia
|
|
Type / Role
|
Multirole Air Superiority Fighter
Stealth Air Superiority / Multirole Fighter
|
|
Generation
|
4++
Fifth
|
|
Status
|
Active Service
In limited service
|
|
First Flight
|
February 19, 2008
January 29, 2010
|
|
Introduction / In Service Since
|
2014
2020
|
|
Number Built
|
120+
~25 (as of 2025)
|
|
Operators
|
Russia, China, Egypt, Indonesia (pending)
Russian Aerospace Forces
|
Dimensions & Structure
|
Length
|
21.9 m
20.1 m
|
|
Wingspan
|
15.3 m
14.1 m
|
|
Height
|
5.9 m
4.6 m
|
|
Wing Area
|
62 m²
78.8 m²
|
|
Empty Weight
|
18,400 kg
~18,000 kg
|
|
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)
|
34,500 kg
35,000 kg
|
|
Internal Weapons Bay
|
None
Yes (2 main, 2 side)
|
|
External Hardpoints
|
12
6
|
Performance
|
Maximum Speed
|
Mach 2.25 (2,400 km/h)
Mach 2.0
|
|
Range
|
3,600 km (ferry)
3,500 km
|
|
Combat Radius
|
1,500 km
1,500 km
|
|
Service Ceiling
|
18,000 m
20,000 m
|
|
Rate of Climb
|
280 m/s
330 m/s
|
|
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
|
1.15
~1.15
|
|
G Limits
|
+9
+9
|
Powerplant
|
Engine Type
|
Saturn AL-41F1S (117S)
Saturn AL-41F1 (future Izdeliye 30)
|
|
No. of Engines
|
2
2
|
|
Thrust (each)
|
142 kN with afterburner
142 kN with afterburner
|
|
Thrust Vectoring
|
Yes (3D TVC)
Yes (3D)
|
|
Fuel Capacity
|
~11,500 kg internal
~10,300 kg
|
Armament
|
Gun
|
1× 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon
30mm GSh-30-1 cannon
|
|
Missiles (Air-to-Air)
|
R-77, R-27, R-73
R-77, R-74M, R-37M
|
|
Missiles (Air-to-Ground)
|
Kh-31, Kh-29, Kh-59
Kh-38, Kh-59MK2
|
|
Bombs
|
FAB series, KAB precision-guided bombs
KAB-250/500 guided bombs
|
|
Hardpoints
|
12
10 (internal + external)
|
|
Payload Capacity
|
8,000 kg
10,000 kg
|
Avionics & Systems
|
Radar
|
Irbis-E PESA radar
N036 Byelka AESA
|
|
Radar Range
|
400 km (air targets)
400+ km
|
|
Electronic Warfare (EW) System
|
Khibiny-M
L402 Himalayas suite
|
|
Targeting System
|
OLS-35 IRST
IRST + radar fusion
|
|
Helmet Display
|
Yes
Integrated HMS
|
|
Navigation
|
GLONASS/INS
GLONASS-based INS
|
|
Autopilot / AI Assistance
|
Digital flight control
Partial autonomy
|
|
Communication
|
Secure data link, VHF/UHF radio
Encrypted data link
|
Stealth & Technology
|
Radar Cross Section (RCS)
|
~1–3 m²
Estimated 0.3–0.5 m²
|
|
Stealth Features
|
Radar-absorbent coatings, composite materials
Internal bays, radar-absorbing composites
|
|
Infrared Signature Reduction
|
Moderate (engine shielding)
Engine shielding, cooling design
|
|
Sensor Fusion
|
Limited
Multi-source integration
|
|
Networking Capabilities
|
Tactical data link
Limited data-link interoperability
|
Variants
|
Special Export Versions
|
Su-35SK (China), Su-35E (Egypt)
Su-57E (Export Variant)
|
Operational History
|
Major Conflicts / Deployments
|
Syria, Ukraine (limited combat use)
Syria (testing), Ukraine (limited combat)
|
|
Notable Operators
|
Russia, China, Egypt
Russia
|
|
Combat Proven?
|
Yes
Limited
|
|
Mission Types
|
Air superiority, interception, strike, escort
Air superiority, strike, reconnaissance
|
Cost & Program
|
Unit Cost
|
~$85 million (export)
~$45–50 million (estimated)
|
|
Development Cost
|
Estimated $1.5 billion
~$10 billion (PAK FA program)
|
|
Program Name
|
Su-35 Development Program
PAK FA (T-50)
|
|
Funding Countries
|
Russia
Russia
|
Additional Information
|
Upgrades Planned
|
Radar and cockpit modernization
New radar, Izdeliye 30 engines
|
|
Future Replacement
|
Su-57 Felon
None planned (Su-57M modernization)
|
|
Export Restrictions
|
Russian arms control regulations
Controlled by Russian government
|
|
Notable Achievements
|
High agility and radar performance
Russia’s first fifth-gen stealth jet
|
|
Competitors
|
F-15EX, Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon
F-22 Raptor, F-35 Lightning II, J-20 Mighty Dragon
|
Disclaimer Note
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.