- Home
- Defense Systems
- Fighter Jets
- Northrop YF-23 Fighter
Northrop YF-23 Fighter



Defense Systems Full Specifications
General Information
| Name | Northrop YF-23 |
| Manufacturer | Northrop and McDonnell Douglas |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Type / Role | Experimental stealth air-superiority fighter |
| Generation | 5th |
| Status | Retired prototypes |
| First Flight | August 27, 1990 |
| Introduction / In Service Since | Never entered operational service |
| Number Built | 2 prototypes |
| Operators | U.S. Air Force test program |
Dimensions & Structure
| Length | Approximately 20.55 m |
| Wingspan | Approximately 13.28 m |
| Height | Approximately 4.24 m |
| Wing Area | Approximately 83.6 m² |
| Empty Weight | No consistently verified public figure |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | No reliably established public figure |
| Internal Weapons Bay | Proposed internal weapons bays |
| External Hardpoints | No operational configuration established |
Performance
| Maximum Speed | Designed to exceed Mach 2 |
| Range | Exact verified figure unavailable |
| Combat Radius | Not established |
| Service Ceiling | No reliably established public figure |
| Rate of Climb | Not established |
| Thrust-to-Weight Ratio | Not reliably established |
| G Limits | No verified operational limit published |
Powerplant
| Engine Type | Afterburning turbofan |
| No. of Engines | 2 |
| Thrust (each) | Approximately 35,000 lbf class, depending on engine configuration |
| Thrust Vectoring | Evaluated as part of the propulsion design, with configuration differences between prototypes |
| Fuel Capacity | Not reliably established in public sources |
Armament
| Gun | No operational gun installation established |
| Missiles (Air-to-Air) | AIM-120 AMRAAM and AIM-9 Sidewinder were associated with proposed armament concepts |
| Missiles (Air-to-Ground) | No verified operational integration |
| Bombs | No verified operational integration |
| Hardpoints | No operational hardpoint configuration established |
| Payload Capacity | Not established for operational service |
Avionics & Systems
| Radar | Planned advanced fighter radar; exact configuration not fully disclosed |
| Radar Range | Not publicly established |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) System | Planned integrated capability; detailed specifications unavailable |
| Targeting System | No complete operational targeting configuration established |
| Helmet Display | Not established as an operational system |
| Navigation | Experimental flight-test navigation systems |
| Autopilot / AI Assistance | No verified AI-assisted combat capability |
| Communication | Experimental test aircraft communications; complete operational configuration unavailable |
Stealth & Technology
| Radar Cross Section (RCS) | Classified or not publicly established |
| Stealth Features | Shaped airframe, internal weapons storage concept, reduced radar-signature design |
| Infrared Signature Reduction | Engine placement and exhaust design addressed signature-management objectives; verified reduction figures unavailable |
| Sensor Fusion | No verified production-level sensor-fusion configuration |
| Networking Capabilities | No verified operational networked-combat configuration |
Variants
| Special Export Versions | None |
Operational History
| Major Conflicts / Deployments | None |
| Notable Operators | U.S. Air Force test program |
| Combat Proven? | No |
| Mission Types | Experimental flight testing, air-superiority evaluation, stealth and propulsion testing |
Cost & Program
| Unit Cost | No production unit price |
| Development Cost | No reliably established standalone YF-23 program figure |
| Program Name | Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) |
| Funding Countries | United States |
Additional Information
| Upgrades Planned | None for operational service |
| Future Replacement | The YF-22 was selected for development and became the F-22 Raptor |
| Export Restrictions | No export version; any technology transfer would have been subject to applicable U.S. controls |
| Notable Achievements | Demonstrated an alternative approach to stealth fighter aerodynamics and propulsion |
| Competitors | Lockheed YF-22 |
PROS
- Stealth-focused airframe designed to reduce radar detection.
- Designed for supersonic cruise without afterburner.
- Twin-engine configuration supported high-performance flight.
- Long-range air-superiority mission was a central design objective.
- Advanced aerodynamic design offered valuable engineering lessons.
CONS
- Lost the ATF competition and never entered production.
- No operational combat record.
- Radar range and radar cross-section figures are not publicly established.
- No verified production payload or combat-radius specifications.
- No established production price or operational maintenance record.
Northrop YF-23 Stealth Fighter Prototype
The Northrop YF-23 was an experimental stealth fighter developed to meet the U.S. Air Force’s Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) requirements during the late Cold War. Designed for air superiority, the aircraft combined low-observable shaping, high-speed performance, and long-range mission objectives. Its distinctive diamond-shaped wings, twin-engine layout, and V-shaped tail set it apart from conventional fighter designs.
The YF-23 competed against the Lockheed YF-22 in a program intended to produce a new generation of fighters capable of countering advanced threats. Although the prototype demonstrated promising flight characteristics, the Air Force selected the YF-22 in 1991. That decision led to the F-22 Raptor, while the YF-23 remained an important experimental aircraft in U.S. stealth aviation history.
Manufacturer
Northrop developed the YF-23 in partnership with McDonnell Douglas in the United States. Two prototypes were built, known as PAV-1 and PAV-2. The first used Pratt & Whitney YF119 engines, while the second featured General Electric YF120 engines. The competing powerplants helped evaluate propulsion options for the next-generation fighter program.
Speed and Range
The YF-23 was designed to exceed Mach 2 and support supercruise, meaning sustained supersonic flight without afterburner under suitable conditions. Its aerodynamic configuration emphasized efficient high-speed flight and long-range interception. However, verified operational range, combat radius, and service ceiling figures were never established for a production aircraft.
The design incorporated proposed internal weapons bays to reduce radar visibility. Planned air-to-air armament included missiles such as the AIM-120 AMRAAM, but the YF-23 never entered operational service or completed an operational weapons integration program.
Cost/Price
The YF-23 has no established production unit price because the program ended before manufacturing began. Development spending was part of the wider ATF competition, and a reliable standalone development cost for the aircraft is not generally available. Its historical importance lies in its advanced design approach and its role in shaping the development of U.S. stealth fighters.
Variants
| Variant | Description |
|---|---|
| PAV-1 | First prototype, powered by Pratt & Whitney YF119 engines |
| PAV-2 | Second prototype, powered by General Electric YF120 engines |
| Special Export Versions | None |
Disclaimer Note
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.









