• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins $80 Million Air Force Mission Planning Software Contract
Cyber & Space DefenseDefense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $80 Million Air Force Mission Planning Software Contract

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: November 4, 2026 2:35 am
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
3 Min Read
Lockheed Martin Air Force contract
SHARE

Lockheed Martin has secured a maximum $80 million U.S. Air Force task order to modernize and maintain software supporting the Strategic Mission Planning and Execution System Global Strike Product Support (SMPES GSPS), a system associated with strategic mission planning and nuclear command, control and communications activities.

Contents
  • What the $80 Million Award Covers
  • Why SMPES GSPS Matters to U.S. Strategic Command
  • Software Modernization Is Part of Strategic Force Readiness
  • Lockheed Martin’s Previous Work on Global Strike Software
  • Contract Details

The task order, awarded through the General Services Administration’s Alliant 2 governmentwide acquisition contract, covers software engineering, application modernization, continuous maintenance, sustainment and architectural updates.

According to the November 3, 2026, contract announcement, work will be performed at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, with completion expected by January 19, 2030. The Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center is managing the award under contract number FA2217-27-F-B001.

What the $80 Million Award Covers

The contract focuses on maintaining and improving the existing SMPES GSPS applications suite rather than introducing a publicly announced new weapons system.

- Advertisement -

Lockheed Martin will provide several categories of technical support:

  • Agile software engineering: Continued development and modification of mission planning applications.
  • System modernization: Updates to existing software and supporting technologies.
  • Continuous maintenance: Ongoing technical support to maintain application availability and performance.
  • Sustainment: Long-term support for operational software.
  • Architectural updates: Changes to the underlying software architecture as operational and technical requirements evolve.

The award uses a time-and-materials contract structure and has a maximum value of $80 million.

Importantly, the maximum contract value should not be confused with the amount initially committed by the government.

The Air Force is obligating $868,270 in fiscal 2027 operations and maintenance funding and $500,000 in research, development, test and evaluation funding at the time of award.

That brings the initial obligation to $1.368 million, with further funding potentially provided as work proceeds under the task order.

The acquisition was competitive, although the government received only one offer.

Why SMPES GSPS Matters to U.S. Strategic Command

SMPES GSPS supports a specialized area of U.S. military operations: strategic mission planning and execution.

Its importance is linked to the software infrastructure used to support planning activities for the United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM).

- Advertisement -

Lockheed Martin previously described its Global Strike and Product Support work as providing nuclear command, control and communications planning capabilities for USSTRATCOM’s mission planning and analysis system.

In a May 2021 company announcement, Lockheed Martin also discussed its involvement in establishing the Rogue Blue Software Factory in partnership with the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center.

The software factory was established to develop mission planning and command-and-control applications supporting U.S. Strategic Command.

Lockheed Martin said the GSPS team had implemented 12 software pipelines across three laboratories and introduced a cloud-based development environment. The company reported that this approach reduced the time required to deliver software capabilities from six months to two weeks.

Those figures describe the company’s reported development environment in 2021, not independently verified performance measurements for the newly awarded task order.

Software Modernization Is Part of Strategic Force Readiness

The award highlights an important aspect of maintaining U.S. strategic military capabilities.

Strategic forces depend on more than aircraft, missiles, submarines and communications hardware. Their operational effectiveness also relies on software that supports planning, coordination, information management and command functions.

Mission planning applications must remain compatible with evolving computing environments, security requirements and operational procedures.

Outdated software architectures can create maintenance difficulties, increase cybersecurity exposure and make it harder to introduce new capabilities. Continuous engineering and modernization help address these challenges.

For systems supporting strategic command activities, software reliability and the ability to maintain secure operations are particularly important.

However, the Air Force has not publicly detailed the specific architectural changes, cybersecurity upgrades or new operational features included in the $80 million task order.

The contract announcement also does not identify particular software modules, classified mission-planning functions or measurable capability improvements.

Consequently, the award should be viewed primarily as a software modernization and sustainment investment rather than evidence of a new strategic weapons capability.

Lockheed Martin’s Previous Work on Global Strike Software

Lockheed Martin has an established relationship with the Air Force’s strategic mission-planning software environment.

Its earlier work through the GSPS effort included development activities associated with the Rogue Blue Software Factory, which was designed to support faster delivery of mission planning and command-and-control applications.

The company’s experience with this software environment provides relevant context for the latest award.

Separately, a July 2024 industry-day notice concerning the Strategic Mission Planning and Execution System identified Global Strike and Product Support among several software application areas within the broader SMPES portfolio.

Other identified areas included the Nuclear Planning and Execution System, Missile Applications Software Support and Air Vehicle Planning System.

The notice also showed that the Air Force was examining future software acquisition requirements across the SMPES portfolio.

The November 2026 task order continues investment in one of these application areas, although the available award information does not establish whether it represents a complete replacement of an earlier contract or a continuation of an existing support arrangement.

Contract Details

AttributeDetails
ContractorLockheed Martin Corp.
Contractor locationManassas, Virginia
Maximum task order value$80 million
Contract typeTime-and-materials
Acquisition vehicleGSA Alliant 2
ProgramSMPES GSPS
Contract numberFA2217-27-F-B001
Contracting agencyAir Force Nuclear Weapons Center
Work locationOffutt AFB, Nebraska
Initial funding$1.368 million
CompetitionCompetitive, one offer received
Expected completionJanuary 19, 2030

The latest award provides funding authority for continued engineering and technical support through the end of the current performance period. Its longer-term impact will depend on the software changes delivered, the requirements addressed and the system’s continued role in U.S. strategic command operations.

TAGGED:Lockheed Martinmilitary softwarenuclear command and controlU.S. Air Force
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.

Latest Defense Systems

  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie
  • Northrop YF-23 Fighter Northrop YF-23 Fighter
  • P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Boeing Receives $16.9 Million Contract Modification for Japan’s E-767 AWACS Support
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $80 Million Air Force Mission Planning Software Contract
  • Pakistan Tests Indigenous Fa’az Air-to-Air Missile for First Time
  • Operation Unified Resolve Reports 70% Drop in Rio Grande Valley Border Crossings
  • Iran Releases Footage of Underground Missile Tunnels Amid Rising US Military Tensions

You Might Also Like

PrSM Increment 4 missile
Artillery & Missile SystemsMilitary & Ordnance

Lockheed Martin Advances Ramjet-Powered PrSM Increment 4 Missile

October 26, 2026
F-16 fighter jet
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

F-16 Fighter Jet Evolution Timeline

September 8, 2026
F135 engine sustainment contract
Defense Contracts

RTX Secures $42.1 Million Deal For F135 Engine Sustainment Supporting Global F-35 Fleet

September 7, 2026
Merkava Power Pack contract
Defense Contracts

US Awards $73.5M Merkava Power Pack Contract To Rolls-Royce Solutions America For Israel

February 17, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?