


| Name / Designation | R-17 Elbrus / SS-1c Scud-B |
| Type / Role | Short-Range Ballistic Missile (SRBM), Tactical Strike |
| Country of Origin | Soviet Union |
| Manufacturer | Votkinsk Machine Building Plant |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | 1962 |
| Operational Status | Obsolete (Russia) / Operational (multiple states) |
| Range | 300 km (Scud-B standard) |
| Speed | Mach 5 (terminal phase) |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | Approx. 100-150 km apogee |
| Accuracy (CEP) | 450-900 meters |
| Warhead Type | HE, Fragmentation, Chemical, Nuclear (5-80 kt) |
| Guidance System | Inertial guidance |
| Targeting Mode | Pre-programmed ballistic trajectory |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | Mobile Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL) |
| Seeker Type | None (ballistic inertial) |
| Length | 11.25 m |
| Diameter | 0.88 m |
| Wingspan | N/A (fin-stabilized) |
| Launch Weight | ~5,900 kg |
| Propulsion | Single-stage liquid propellant |
| Warhead Weight | 985 kg (conventional |
| Explosive Type | HE / Chemical / Nuclear |
| Detonation Mechanism | Impact / Proximity |
| Payload Options | Single warhead |
| Operational Range Type | Short |
| Deployment Platform | Ground (mobile) |
| Target Types | Area targets, airfields, troop concentrations |
| Combat Proven | Yes |
| Users / Operators | Russia (phased out), Iran, North Korea, Syria, Yemen, others |
The Scud missile represents one of the most influential and widely proliferated tactical ballistic missiles in modern military history. Originally developed by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, this short-range ballistic missile (SRBM) gained international notoriety for its use in regional conflicts, including the Gulf War and Iran-Iraq War. Designed as a mobile, liquid-fueled system capable of delivering conventional, chemical, or nuclear payloads, the Scud provided Soviet and allied forces with a flexible strike capability against enemy troop concentrations, airfields, and infrastructure.
The Scud series, particularly the R-17/R-300 Elbrus (SS-1c Scud-B), was developed and manufactured in the Soviet Union, primarily by the Votkinsk Machine Building Plant. While Russia has largely phased out the system, numerous variants and derivatives have been produced under license or reverse-engineered by countries including North Korea, Iran, and Iraq.
The Scud-B achieves a maximum speed of Mach 5 during its terminal phase. It has an operational range of approximately 300 km with a 985 kg payload. Earlier Scud-A variants offered shorter ranges around 180 km, while extended modifications reached up to 600-700 km in some derivatives.
Exact current pricing is difficult to determine due to the system’s age and black-market proliferation, but historical estimates for Scud systems and missiles range from several hundred thousand to a few million dollars per unit, depending on variant, condition, and support equipment. This relatively low cost contributed to its widespread adoption by state and non-state actors.
The Scud’s inertial guidance system offers limited accuracy (CEP of 450-900 meters), making it primarily an area-effect weapon. Its single-stage liquid propellant engine requires significant preparation time (around 1 hour) before launch from mobile TELs like the MAZ-543. Despite its obsolescence compared to modern precision-guided systems, the Scud remains a relevant threat in asymmetric warfare due to its simplicity and payload flexibility.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this websiteโs content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More