@2026 – All Right Reserved. TheDefenseWatch.com


| Name | Geran-4 |
| Manufacturer | ALABUGA OEZ PPT JSC |
| Country of Origin | Russia |
| Type / Role | Jet powered one way attack UAV |
| First Flight / Introduced | 2026, public combat deployment reported in 2026 |
| Status | In operational use |
| Unit Cost | Not publicly verified |
| Maximum Speed | 350 km/h |
| Cruise Speed | 320 km/h |
| Operational Range | 770 km |
| Endurance | 2.2 hours |
| Service Ceiling | Up to 4,000 m |
| Rate of Climb | Not publicly disclosed |
| Length | 3.6 m |
| Wingspan | 3.05 m |
| Height | Not publicly disclosed |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | Up to 450 kg |
| Payload Capacity | 50 kg warhead |
| Hardpoints | Not publicly disclosed |
| Weapons | TBBCH-50, ZBBCH-50, OFBCH-2 |
| Sensors | Camera and other onboard components identified in recovered examples |
| Avionics | Navigation, communications and anti-jamming systems |
| Engine Type | Turbojet |
| Engine Power | Telefly LX-WP-160 or TF-TJ2000A identified on recovered systems |
| Propeller Type | Not applicable |
| Control Type | Autonomous / remotely supported |
| Data Link Range | Not publicly disclosed |
| Navigation | Satellite navigation and onboard navigation systems |
| Ground Control Station | Not publicly disclosed |
| Primary Users | Russian Armed Forces |
| Combat Proven | Yes, combat deployment reported in Ukraine in 2026 |
The Geran-4 is a Russian jet powered one way attack unmanned aerial vehicle developed for long range strike missions. It represents a major change from earlier propeller driven Geran systems, combining a reinforced airframe with a turbojet engine to increase speed and improve maneuverability.
The system entered Russian combat deployment in Ukraine in 2026. Ukrainian Defence Intelligence identifies ALABUGA OEZ PPT JSC, based in the Alabuga Special Economic Zone in Tatarstan, as its manufacturer. The drone is intended for attacks against fixed targets and is designed to operate in environments where conventional propeller driven attack drones face increasingly effective interception.
The Geran-4 has a length of approximately 3.6 meters and a wingspan of 3.05 meters. Its reinforced structure is designed to support higher speed and maneuvering loads. Ukrainian intelligence has identified Telefly turbojet engines on recovered examples, including the LX-WP-160 and the higher thrust TF-TJ2000A.
The drone incorporates navigation, communications and electronic components associated with the wider Geran family. Its documented warhead configuration includes a 50 kg payload, with explosive fragmentation, incendiary and thermobaric options identified in Ukrainian intelligence records.
The latest Ukrainian intelligence specification lists a maximum speed of 350 km/h, cruise speed of 320 km/h, flight time of about 2.2 hours and a range of 770 km. Earlier intelligence reporting cited speeds as high as 500 km/h and shorter ranges depending on configuration, so performance figures should be treated as variant dependent.
No verified Russian procurement price or production cost for the Geran-4 has been publicly disclosed. Some secondary sources publish estimated prices, but these figures are not supported by an audited procurement contract and should not be treated as confirmed.
The Geran-4 is primarily a one way strike drone intended to deliver an explosive payload against ground targets. Its higher speed compared with earlier Geran variants is intended to complicate interception and support penetration of contested airspace.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.