

| Ship Type | Aircraft Carrier |
| Class | Type 004 |
| Length | Estimated 320 to 330 m |
| Beam (Width) | Estimated 75 to 80 m |
| Flight Deck Width | Approx 80 to 90 m |
| Draft | Around 11 m |
| Displacement (Full Load) | Estimated 100,000 plus tons |
| Propulsion Type | Nuclear |
| Powerplant | Multiple naval nuclear reactors (estimated) |
| Shafts | Likely 4 |
| Maximum Speed | 30 plus knots |
| Range | Practically unlimited |
| Endurance | Several months without refueling |
| Aircraft Launch System | CATOBAR |
| Catapult Type | Electromagnetic (EMALS equivalent) |
| Recovery System | Arresting gear |
| Total Aircraft Capacity | 70 to 90 aircraft |
| Hangar Capacity | Full length enclosed hangar |
| Aircraft Types Supported | Fighters, AEW, UAVs, helicopters |
| Primary Radar | AESA multifunction radar |
| Navigation Radar | Standard naval navigation radar |
| Fire Control Radar | Integrated with CIWS |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | ESM, ECM, jammers |
| Communication Systems | SATCOM and national tactical data links |
| CIWS | Type 1130 |
| Short-Range SAMs | HQ-10 |
| Missile Launchers | Limited surface defense only |
| Decoy Systems | Chaff, flares, electronic decoys |
| Combat Management System | Integrated PLAN CMS |
| Combat Information Center (CIC) | Central command hub |
| Air Operations Center | Manages carrier air wing |
| Data Links | Tactical and satellite communications |
| Ship Crew | Estimated 2,500 to 3,000 |
| Air Wing Personnel | Around 1,500 |
| Total Complement | Over 4,000 personnel |
| Shipbuilder/Manufacturer | China State Shipbuilding Corporation |
| Construction Started | Not publicly confirmed |
| Commissioned | Not yet |
| Estimated Cost | Estimated 12 to 15 billion USD |
The Type 004 aircraft carrier represents China’s most ambitious naval aviation project to date. Designed as the follow on to the Fujian Type 003, this future carrier is expected to mark China’s transition into full scale nuclear powered carrier operations. For the United States and its allies, the Type 004 is closely watched as a potential peer level platform that could reshape naval balance in the Indo Pacific.
Developed by China State Shipbuilding Corporation for the People’s Liberation Army Navy, the Type 004 is believed to be intended as a true supercarrier. Its core mission is sustained power projection, long range air operations, and fleet air defense far from mainland bases. Unlike earlier Chinese carriers, the Type 004 is widely assessed to use nuclear propulsion, allowing extended deployments without refueling and higher sustained speeds.
The carrier is expected to feature a large CATOBAR flight deck with electromagnetic catapults similar in concept to US Navy EMALS systems. This allows launch of heavier aircraft such as airborne early warning platforms, electronic warfare jets, and potentially unmanned combat aircraft. The air wing may include J 15 variants, the newer J 35 stealth fighter, KJ 600 AEW aircraft, and multiple rotary wing assets.
Advanced sensors are likely to include multifunction AESA radars, integrated electronic warfare systems, and networked command and control optimized for joint operations. Defensive systems are expected to focus on layered close in protection using CIWS, short range missiles, and soft kill decoys, relying on escort ships for area defense.
The Type 004 aircraft carrier does not have an official public price. Based on size, nuclear propulsion, and air wing support infrastructure, analysts estimate costs comparable to US nuclear carriers, potentially exceeding 12 billion US dollars per ship.
If completed, the Type 004 would significantly enhance China’s ability to conduct long duration carrier strike operations, narrowing capability gaps with US Navy supercarriers while increasing regional strategic competition.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More