


| System Name | SeaRAM Close-In Weapon System |
| Manufacturer | Raytheon Technologies |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Type / Role | Naval Point Defense Missile System |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2008 |
| Unit Cost | USD 25–30 Million (Estimated) |
| Maximum Engagement Range | 9 km |
| Maximum Engagement Altitude | 6 km |
| Target Types | Anti-Ship Missiles, UAVs, Helicopters, Aircraft |
| Interception Probability | High against subsonic sea-skimming threats |
| Reaction Time | Seconds |
| Radar Detection Range | 20+ km |
| Missile Type | RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile |
| Missile Length | 2.79 m |
| Missile Weight | 73.5 kg |
| Warhead Type | Blast Fragmentation |
| Warhead Weight | 11.3 kg |
| Speed | Mach 2+ |
| Radar Type | Ku-Band Tracking Radar |
| Radar Name | Phalanx Sensor Suite |
| Detection Range | 20+ km |
| Tracking Capacity | Multiple Simultaneous Threats |
| Guidance System | Passive RF / Infrared Homing |
| Fire Control System | Automated Autonomous Fire Control |
| Launcher Type | Ship-Mounted 11-Cell Launcher |
| No. of Missiles per Launcher | 11 |
| Reload Time | Several Minutes in Port |
| Mobility Platform | Naval Surface Combatants |
| Crew Required | Minimal Operator Oversight |
| C2 System | Integrated Naval Combat System |
| Connectivity | Secure Naval Data Links |
| Network Capability | Yes |
| Operation Mode | Autonomous / Manual Override |
| Primary Operator | United States, Germany, South Korea, Qatar |
| Combat Proven | Yes |
| Conflict History | Maritime Security Operations |
| Notable Feature | Autonomous Close-In Missile Defense |
The SeaRAM Close-In Weapon System is a modern naval point defense weapon designed to protect warships from incoming anti-ship missiles, drones, helicopters, aircraft, and fast attack threats. Developed for the U.S. Navy and allied fleets, SeaRAM combines the proven sensor suite of the Phalanx Close-In Weapon System with the RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile launcher, creating a rapid-response defensive shield for naval vessels operating in contested maritime environments.
Manufactured by Raytheon Technologies in partnership with RTX and RAM-System GmbH, SeaRAM was introduced as a lightweight, autonomous solution for ships that require advanced close-in defense without the larger footprint of traditional missile systems.
The system uses an 11-cell launcher armed with RIM-116 missiles capable of intercepting high-speed threats at short range. SeaRAM integrates radar and electro-optical tracking systems from the Phalanx platform, allowing fully autonomous target detection, tracking, and engagement. The missile reaches speeds above Mach 2 and is optimized for defending naval vessels against sea-skimming cruise missiles and unmanned aerial systems.
SeaRAM is currently deployed aboard several U.S. Navy vessels, including Littoral Combat Ships, aircraft carriers, amphibious assault ships, and allied naval platforms worldwide. Its modular design allows rapid installation on existing ships with minimal structural modifications.
Estimated system cost varies depending on configuration and integration requirements, though reports place a single SeaRAM launcher package at approximately USD 25 million to USD 30 million, excluding missile reloads and ship integration costs.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More