



| Name / Designation | GBU-28 |
| Type | Precision-Guided Penetrator Bomb |
| Manufacturer | Raytheon |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Year Introduced | 1991 |
| Operational Status | Active |
| Weight | Approx. 4,700 lb (2,130 kg) |
| Length | Approx. 19 ft (5.8 m) |
| Diameter | Approx. 14.5 in |
| Casing Type | Hardened Steel Penetrator |
| Yield | Conventional High Explosive |
| Guidance | Laser Guidance |
| Accuracy (CEP) | High precision, estimated within a few meters |
| Delivery Platforms | F-15E, B-2 Spirit |
| Penetration Capability | Deep reinforced concrete penetration |
| Warhead Type | High-Explosive Penetrator |
| Fuzing Options | Delayed impact fuze |
| Explosive Composition | Tritonal or equivalent explosive fill |
| Primary Mission | Destroy hardened underground targets |
| Operators | United States and allied operators |
| Notable Deployments / History | Gulf War, Middle East strike operations |
| Variants | GBU-28A/B and upgraded guidance variants |
The GBU-28 Bomb is a U.S.-developed precision-guided bunker buster designed to destroy deeply buried and hardened military targets. Developed during the Gulf War in the early 1990s, the bomb was created to penetrate reinforced underground bunkers, command centers, and fortified facilities that standard munitions could not effectively destroy.
The weapon combines a heavy penetrating warhead with laser guidance technology, allowing it to strike targets with high accuracy. The GBU-28 became one of the most recognized bunker-penetrating weapons used by the U.S. Air Force and allied forces in modern combat operations. Its operational role focuses on strategic deep-strike missions against heavily protected infrastructure.
The GBU-28 was primarily developed by Raytheon in cooperation with the United States Air Force. Early versions used modified artillery barrel casings to accelerate wartime production during Operation Desert Storm.
The bomb integrates the Paveway laser-guidance kit, enabling precision targeting from aircraft such as the F-15E Strike Eagle, B-2 Spirit, and other compatible combat aircraft.
The GBU-28 itself is an air-dropped gravity bomb and does not possess an onboard propulsion system. Its operational range depends on the launch altitude and speed of the delivery aircraft. When released from high altitude, the bomb gains significant kinetic energy, allowing it to penetrate multiple meters of reinforced concrete and underground structures before detonation.
The laser-guided navigation system provides high accuracy with a low Circular Error Probable (CEP), making it effective against hardened strategic targets. The bomb is optimized for high-speed strike aircraft operating in contested environments.
Estimated unit costs for the GBU-28 vary depending on guidance packages and modernization upgrades. Public estimates generally place the cost between $200,000 and $300,000 per unit. Exact pricing remains dependent on production contracts, integration requirements, and export configurations.
The GBU-28 is designed to destroy hardened underground bunkers, command centers, and fortified military structures.
No. The GBU-28 is a conventional precision-guided penetrator bomb.
Aircraft such as the F-15E Strike Eagle and B-2 Spirit are capable of deploying the weapon.
The bomb uses laser guidance technology to accurately strike designated targets.
The weapon was first introduced and used during the 1991 Gulf War.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More