- Home
- Defense Systems
- Compare
- Eurofighter Typhoon vs Rafale vs F-35: Fighter Jet Comparison
Eurofighter Typhoon vs Rafale vs F-35: Fighter Jet Comparison
The Eurofighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale, and F-35 Lightning II represent Europe’s premier multirole fighter jets, each excelling in unique domains. The Typhoon offers unmatched agility and air superiority in dogfights, while the Rafale combines versatility with advanced avionics for strike and reconnaissance missions. The F-35, though American-made, is integrated into European air forces, bringing stealth, sensor fusion, and network-centric warfare capabilities. Comparing speed, maneuverability, payload, and operational range highlights distinct advantages for each aircraft. This analysis provides military enthusiasts and defense professionals with a clear snapshot of Europe’s leading air combat platforms.
General Information
|
Name
|
Eurofighter Typhoon
Dassault Rafale
F-35 Lightning II |
|
Manufacturer
|
Airbus, BAE Systems, Leonardo
Dassault Aviation
Lockheed Martin |
|
Country of Origin
|
UK / Germany / Italy / Spain
France
United States |
|
Type / Role
|
Multirole Fighter
Multirole Fighter
Multirole Stealth Fighter |
|
Generation
|
4.5th
4.5th
5th |
|
Status
|
Active Service
Active Service
In Service |
|
First Flight
|
March 27, 1994
July 4, 1986
December 15, 2006 |
|
Introduction / In Service Since
|
2003
2001
2015 |
|
Number Built
|
600+
240+
1,200+ (as of 2025) |
|
Operators
|
UK, Germany, Italy, Spain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Austria, Kuwait
France, India, Egypt, Qatar, Greece, Indonesia
USA, UK, Japan, Israel, Italy, Australia, and others |
Dimensions & Structure
|
Length
|
15.96 m (52.4 ft)
15.27 m
51.2 ft (15.6 m) |
|
Wingspan
|
10.95 m (35.9 ft)
10.9 m
35 ft (10.7 m) |
|
Height
|
5.28 m (17.3 ft)
5.3 m
14.4 ft (4.38 m) |
|
Wing Area
|
51.2 m²
45.7 m²
460 sq ft (42.7 m²) |
|
Empty Weight
|
11,000 kg
10,600 kg
29,300 lb (13,300 kg) |
|
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)
|
23,500 kg
24,500 kg
70,000 lb (31,800 kg) |
|
Internal Weapons Bay
|
None
None
2 (up to 5,700 lb payload) |
|
External Hardpoints
|
13
14
6–10 (up to 18,000 lb total) |
Performance
|
Maximum Speed
|
Mach 2.0 (2,495 km/h)
Mach 1.8 (2,223 km/h)
Mach 1.6 |
|
Range
|
2,900 km
3,700 km
1,380 mi (2,220 km) |
|
Combat Radius
|
1,390 km
1,000–1,850 km
~670 mi (1,080 km) |
|
Service Ceiling
|
55,000 ft
50,000 ft
50,000 ft (15,240 m) |
|
Rate of Climb
|
62,000 ft/min
305 m/s
45,000 ft/min |
|
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
|
1.15
1.13
0.87 |
|
G Limits
|
+9g
+9 / -3.6
+9 |
Powerplant
|
Engine Type
|
Eurojet EJ200 Turbofan
Snecma M88-2 Turbofan
Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-100 |
|
No. of Engines
|
2
2
1 |
|
Thrust (each)
|
20,000 lbf
16,500 lbf
43,000 lbf |
|
Thrust Vectoring
|
Optional (prototype)
No
Yes (on F-35B variant) |
|
Fuel Capacity
|
~5,000 kg internal
4,700 kg (internal)
~18,500 lb internal |
Armament
|
Gun
|
1× 27mm Mauser BK-27 cannon
GIAT 30mm cannon
GAU-22/A 25mm cannon (F-35A) |
|
Missiles (Air-to-Air)
|
AIM-120 AMRAAM, Meteor, IRIS-T
MICA, Meteor
AIM-120 AMRAAM, AIM-9X |
|
Missiles (Air-to-Ground)
|
Brimstone, Storm Shadow
SCALP-EG, AM39 Exocet
AGM-154 JSOW, AGM-158 JASSM |
|
Bombs
|
Paveway IV, JDAM
Paveway, AASM
JDAM, Paveway II/III, SDB I/II |
|
Hardpoints
|
13
14
6 external + 2 internal |
|
Payload Capacity
|
9,000 kg
9,500 kg
~18,000 lb |
Avionics & Systems
|
Radar
|
Captor-E AESA
Thales RBE2 AESA
AN/APG-81 AESA |
|
Radar Range
|
~160 km
200+ km
~150+ km |
|
Electronic Warfare (EW) System
|
DASS suite
SPECTRA Suite
AN/ASQ-239 suite |
|
Targeting System
|
Litening III pod
Thales Damocles / TALIOS Pod
EOTS (Electro-Optical Targeting System) |
|
Helmet Display
|
Striker II
Integrated HMD
HMDS Gen III |
|
Navigation
|
INS/GPS
GPS/INS
GPS/INS with terrain-following |
|
Autopilot / AI Assistance
|
Digital flight control
Semi-Automated
Advanced flight management |
|
Communication
|
Secure data link, MIDS
Secure Datalink, SATCOM
MADL & Link 16 secure data links |
Stealth & Technology
|
Radar Cross Section (RCS)
|
~1–2 m²
~1 m²
~0.001 m² |
|
Stealth Features
|
Reduced radar signature materials
Radar-absorbent materials
RAM coating, internal weapons bay, edge alignment |
|
Infrared Signature Reduction
|
Moderate
Yes
Yes |
|
Sensor Fusion
|
Advanced data integration
Full
Full 360° data integration |
|
Networking Capabilities
|
NATO Link-16, future FCAS integration
NATO-compatible datalink
Distributed data-sharing with allied units |
Variants
|
Special Export Versions
|
Kuwait, Qatar (enhanced avionics)
Rafale EH/IH (India), Rafale EM/QM (Egypt/Qatar)
F-35I (Israel), F-35A (Japan), etc. |
Operational History
|
Major Conflicts / Deployments
|
Libya (2011), Baltic Air Policing
Libya, Mali, Iraq, Syria
Middle East operations (Iraq, Syria) |
|
Notable Operators
|
RAF, Luftwaffe, Italian Air Force
France, India, Egypt
USAF, USN, USMC, RAF, IDF |
|
Combat Proven?
|
Yes
Yes
Yes |
|
Mission Types
|
Air superiority, strike, reconnaissance
Air superiority, strike, reconnaissance, deterrence
Air superiority, strike, SEAD, ISR |
Cost & Program
|
Unit Cost
|
~$95 million
$85–115 million
$80–100 million (variant-dependent) |
|
Development Cost
|
~$45 billion total
~$45 billion
~$400 billion (program total) |
|
Program Name
|
Eurofighter Program
Rafale Program
Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) |
|
Funding Countries
|
UK, Germany, Italy, Spain
France
USA, UK, Italy, Netherlands, Canada, Australia, etc. |
Additional Information
|
Upgrades Planned
|
Radar and weapons modernization
F4 & F5 standard upgrades
Block 4, Tech Refresh 3 |
|
Future Replacement
|
FCAS (Future Combat Air System)
Next-Gen Fighter (FCAS)
NGAD (2035+) |
|
Export Restrictions
|
Limited by EU arms policy
Minimal (case-by-case)
U.S. FMS approval required |
|
Notable Achievements
|
Key NATO air defense asset
Combat-proven multirole success
Widest global fighter program in history |
|
Competitors
|
F-16V, Rafale, Gripen E
Eurofighter Typhoon, F/A-18E/F, Gripen E
Su-57, J-20, Tempest, KF-21 |
Disclaimer Note
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.