- Home
- Defense Systems
- Attack & Multirole Drones (UAVs)
- MQ-9A Reaper Drone
MQ-9A Reaper Drone











Defense Systems Full Specifications
1. General Information
| Name | MQ-9A Reaper |
| Manufacturer | General Atomics Aeronautical Systems |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Type / Role | Attack / Multirole UAV |
| First Flight / Introduced | 2001 / 2007 |
| Status | In Service |
| Unit Cost | USD 16 Million (Approx.) |
2. Performance
| Maximum Speed | 480 km/h |
| Cruise Speed | 310 km/h |
| Operational Range | 1,850 km |
| Endurance | 24 to 40 hours |
| Service Ceiling | 50,000 ft |
| Rate of Climb | 12 m/s |
3. Dimensions
| Length | 11 m |
| Wingspan | 20 m |
| Height | 3.8 m |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 4,760 kg |
4. Payload & Armament
| Payload Capacity | 1,700 kg |
| Hardpoints | 6 |
| Weapons | AGM-114 Hellfire, Paveway II |
| Sensors | EO/IR, Synthetic Aperture Radar, Laser Designator |
| Avionics | Satellite Link, GPS/INS Navigation |
5. Propulsion
| Engine Type | Honeywell TPE331-10 Turboprop |
| Engine Power | 900 shp |
| Propeller Type | 3 Blade Constant Speed |
6. Communication & Control
| Control Type | Remote / Autonomous |
| Data Link Range | 200 km Line of Sight / Satellite Beyond LOS |
| Navigation | GPS / INS |
| Ground Control Station | Portable or Fixed Facility |
7. Operational Use
| Primary Users | USAF, CIA, NATO, UK, France, Italy |
| Combat Proven | Yes |
| Notable Operations | Afghanistan, Syria, Libya |
PROS
- Long endurance up to 40 hours
- Precision strike capability
- Proven combat record
- Satellite based remote control
- High payload capacity for a UAV
CONS
- Vulnerable to advanced air defenses
- Requires secure satellite links
- Limited survivability in peer conflict
- Slower than jet powered aircraft
- High lifecycle and support costs
MQ-9A Reaper Drone, U.S. Armed UAV Platform
The MQ-9A Reaper is one of the most widely used armed unmanned aerial vehicles in U.S. military service. Designed for long endurance intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and precision strike missions, it has reshaped modern counterterrorism and remote warfare operations. Its ability to remain airborne for extended periods while carrying guided weapons makes it a core asset for persistent battlefield presence.
Manufacturer and Origin
The MQ-9A is developed and produced by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, based in the United States. It first flew in 2001 and entered U.S. Air Force service in 2007. The aircraft was built as a more capable successor to the earlier MQ-1 Predator, offering greater payload capacity, higher altitude performance, and expanded strike capability.
Speed, Range, and Capabilities
Powered by a Honeywell TPE331-10 turboprop engine, the MQ-9A reaches a maximum speed of about 480 km per hour, with a cruise speed near 310 km per hour. It has an operational range of roughly 1,850 km and can remain airborne for 24 to 40 hours depending on mission configuration.
The drone carries up to 1,700 kg of payload across six hardpoints. Typical armament includes AGM-114 Hellfire missiles and laser guided bombs such as the Paveway II. Advanced sensors include electro optical and infrared systems, synthetic aperture radar, and laser targeting systems. Satellite communications allow beyond line of sight control from ground stations.
Cost and Operational Use
The unit cost of an MQ-9A is approximately 16 million USD, excluding support infrastructure. It is combat proven in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and other theaters. The platform is operated by the U.S. Air Force, CIA, and several allied nations including the UK, France, and Italy.
Disclaimer Note
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.









