GBU-75 Bomb

Manufacturer: Boeing Defense
Category: Bombs & Aerial Munitions
Add to Compare

Warhead Type Conventional precision bomb
Delivery Platforms Carrier aircraft, tactical jets
Guidance GPS / INS
Operational Role Long-range precision strike

Defense Systems Full Specifications

1. General Information

Name / Designation	GBU-75
Type	Precision-Guided Bomb
Manufacturer	Boeing
Country of Origin	United States
Year Introduced	2026 (publicly revealed)
Operational Status	Testing / Qualification

2. Physical Characteristics

Weight	Not public
Length	Not public
Diameter	JDAM-based bod
Casing Type	Conventional bomb casing

3. Performance

Yield	Conventional
Guidance	GPS / INS
Accuracy (CEP)	Not public
Delivery Platforms	F/A-18F and future naval aircraft
Penetration Capability	Variant dependent

4. Warhead / Explosive Details

Warhead Type	HE / Penetrator possible
Fuzing Options	Programmable, likely JDAM standard
Explosive Composition	Not public

5. Operational Use

Primary Mission	Long-range naval strike
Operators	Expected U.S. Navy
Notable Deployments / History	Demonstration tests in 2026

6. Variants

Variants

JDAM-LR concept versions

Our Rating

The overall rating is based on review by our experts

Technology 8 / 10
Stealth Capability 8 / 10
Performance 8 / 10
Payload Capacity 8 / 10

PROS

Long standoff range for safer launches
Uses proven JDAM technology base
Likely lower cost than cruise missiles
Compatible with carrier aircraft
All-weather precision strike capability

CONS

Public pricing remains unknown
Still in qualification/testing phase
Slower than supersonic missiles
Depends on GPS resilience
Payload smaller than heavy cruise missiles

GBU-75 JDAM-LR Smart Bomb

The GBU-75 is a newly designated U.S. precision-guided bomb based on the proven Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) family. Unlike standard JDAM weapons that glide after release, the GBU-75 adds a compact turbojet engine and wing kit, turning a gravity bomb into a powered standoff strike weapon. This gives naval aircraft a much longer engagement range while keeping launch aircraft farther from enemy air defenses. Recent reports indicate the weapon demonstrated an approximate range of 200 nautical miles during U.S. Navy testing from an F/A-18F Super Hornet.

Manufacturer

The GBU-75 is developed by Boeing, which also produces the JDAM guidance kit family. Boeing integrated a Kratos TDI TJ85 turbojet engine, folding wing kit, and updated guidance components into the bomb. The weapon is aimed primarily at U.S. Navy carrier aviation, offering an affordable long-range strike option using existing JDAM architecture.

Speed and Range

Official speed figures have not been released publicly, but the turbojet-powered design gives the GBU-75 sustained powered flight beyond normal glide bomb distances. Its reported combat reach of around 200 nautical miles (370 km) greatly exceeds many legacy unguided bombs. Guidance is expected to rely on GPS / INS navigation, similar to standard JDAM systems, supporting all-weather precision strike capability.

GBU-75 JDAM-LR Smart Bomb Cost / Price

Exact unit pricing has not been publicly disclosed. However, analysts expect the GBU-75 to cost less than many cruise missiles because it uses an existing bomb body and JDAM-based architecture. This could make it an attractive option for high-volume naval strike missions where affordability matters.

- Advertisement -

No confirmed public price. Estimated cost would likely vary based on engine package, guidance kit, and production quantity.

Disclaimer Note

The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.