Hawk T2 Jet Trainer

Manufacturer: BAE Systems
Category: Bombers & Strategic Aircraft
Add to Compare

Maximum Speed Mach 0.84 (1,028 km/h)
Range 2,520 km (ferry)
Payload Capacity Up to ~3,000 kg (external)
Crew 2 (instructor and student)

Defense Systems Full Specifications

1. General Information

Name	Hawk T2 (Hawk 128)
Manufacturer	BAE Systems
Country of Origin	United Kingdom
Introduction / In Service Since	2009 (RAF operational)
Status	In Service (UK primary operator)
Category	Advanced Jet Trainer
Crew	2
Unit Cost	~$27–30 million (estimated)

2. Dimensions & Structure

Length	12.43 m (40 ft 9 in)
Wingspan	9.94 m (32 ft 7 in)
Height	3.98 m (13 ft 1 in)
Wing Area	16.70 m² (179.64 sq ft)
Empty Weight	4,480 kg (9,880 lb)
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)	9,100 kg (20,000 lb)

3. Performance

Maximum Speed	Mach 0.84 (1,028 km/h)
Range	2,520 km
Combat Radius	Not primary (training-focused)
Service Ceiling	~13,565 m (44,500 ft)
Rate of Climb	~3,597 m/min (11,800 ft/min)

4. Powerplant

Engine Type	1 × Rolls-Royce/Turbomeca Adour Mk 951 turbofan
Thrust (per engine)	29 kN (6,500 lbf)
Total Thrust	29 kN

5. Payload & Armament

Internal Payload Capacity	Limited (training configuration)
Weapons Bay	None
Compatible Weapons	Practice munitions, AIM-9 equivalents, gun pod (optional)
Hardpoints	5+ (wing and centerline)

6. Avionics & Systems

Radar System	Synthetic radar via data link
Navigation	Advanced glass cockpit / INS
Electronic Warfare (EW)	Sensor simulation / RWR
Stealth Features	None

7. Operational History

Primary Operator	Royal Air Force (UK)
Conflict Usage	Training only (no combat)
Notable Missions	Fast-jet pilot preparation for Typhoon/F-35

8. Additional Information

Variants	Based on Hawk 100 series
Successor / Future Replacement	Under consideration (post-2040 OSD)
Notable Features	Glass cockpit, synthetic training systems
Estimated Operational Life	To ~2040 (planned)

Our Rating

The overall rating is based on review by our experts

6.4

Stealth Capability 4 / 10
Payload Capacity 6 / 10
Range & Endurance 7 / 10
Electronic Warfare 8 / 10
Maintenance Efficiency 7 / 10

PROS

Advanced glass cockpit and synthetic radar closely replicate frontline fighter avionics for seamless transition training.
Excellent aerobatic performance and handling characteristics in a subsonic/transonic regime.
Cost-effective operating hours compared to high-end fighters like the Typhoon.
Proven reliability with a strong global operator base and export track record.
Versatile simulation capabilities, including EW and intercept training without live weapons.

CONS

Limited supersonic performance (Mach 1.2 in dive only), restricting certain high-speed training profiles.
Aging airframe with reported engine and support challenges affecting availability.
Relatively modest payload and combat radius for dedicated light attack roles.
Dependence on specific supply chains for the Adour engine and UK-centric support.
No inherent stealth features, making it less representative of fifth-generation threats.

Hawk T2 Advanced Jet Trainer: RAF’s Proven Fast-Jet Preparation Platform

The Hawk T2 represents a critical evolution in advanced jet training, bridging the gap between basic flight instruction and frontline fighter operations. Developed as an upgrade to the original Hawk series, this transonic, two-seat trainer equips pilots with the skills needed for modern combat aircraft like the Eurofighter Typhoon and F-35 Lightning II. Its glass cockpit and simulation systems provide realistic training scenarios in a cost-effective platform, making it a cornerstone of the United Kingdom Military Flying Training System (UKMFTS).

Manufacturer

BAE Systems, based in the United Kingdom, manufactures the Hawk T2 (also known as Hawk 128). It builds on the original Hawker Siddeley/BAE Hawk design, with production of the T2 variant tied to a 2006 contract for 28 aircraft. The platform has seen extensive export success, with licensed production in India by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).

Speed and Range

The Hawk T2 delivers strong performance for training: a maximum speed of Mach 0.84 (approximately 1,028 km/h or 555 knots) at altitude and a ferry range of about 2,520 km. It reaches a service ceiling of around 42,000–44,500 feet with a strong rate of climb, supporting aerobatic maneuvers and simulated combat profiles.

Cost/Price

Unit cost estimates for Hawk 128/T2 variants hover around $27–30 million (adjusted for advanced configurations). The UK program involved significant investment, including a £450 million production contract in 2006, reflecting the value of its advanced avionics and long-term training savings compared to frontline fighters.

- Advertisement -

The Hawk T2 entered RAF service around 2009–2011 and remains operational, primarily at RAF Valley. It features a Rolls-Royce/Turbomeca Adour Mk 951 turbofan engine providing 29 kN (6,500 lbf) of thrust, enabling efficient high-performance training. While optimized as a trainer, it retains light attack potential with hardpoints for practice weapons, air-to-air missiles (e.g., AIM-9 Sidewinder equivalents), and a centerline gun pod. Advanced systems include synthetic radar via data link, sensor simulation for electronic warfare training, and a glass cockpit with HOTAS controls closely mirroring operational fighters.

Disclaimer Note

The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.