Home
Defense Systems
Compare
F-14 Tomcat vs Su-57: Can a Legend Challenge Russia’s Stealth Fighter?

F-14 Tomcat vs Su-57: Can a Legend Challenge Russia’s Stealth Fighter?

The showdown between the F-14 Tomcat and Russia’s Su-57 is a clash of aviation eras—one defined by Cold War air superiority and the other by next-generation stealth warfare. Although these aircraft never shared the same battlefield, the comparison remains one of the most intriguing “classic vs modern” matchups in military aviation.

The F-14 Tomcat, introduced in the 1970s, became an icon of U.S. naval airpower with its variable-sweep wings, long-range AIM-54 Phoenix missile, and powerful AWG-9 radar—decades ahead of its time. In contrast, the Su-57 represents Russia’s push into 5th-generation stealth technology, combining low-observable shaping, advanced avionics, supermaneuverability, and modern long-range air-to-air weapons.

This analysis explores how a legendary 4th-generation fighter would theoretically stack up against a modern stealth platform. From radar cross-section and sensor capability to speed, agility, and missile range, the F-14’s raw aeronautical muscle is measured against the Su-57’s digital-era advantages. While the Su-57 clearly benefits from 40 years of technological evolution, the Tomcat’s pioneering systems still hold surprising relevance.

Whether for aviation enthusiasts, military analysts, or fans of classic fighters, this comparison highlights how far air combat technology has come—and why the F-14 remains a legend.

- Advertisement -

	F-14 Tomcat Fighter Jet SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter

Price
Our Rating	8.2 8.0
Manufacturer	Grumman Aerospace Corporation Sukhoi
Category	Fighter Jets Fighter Jets

General Information

Name	F-14 Tomcat Su-57 Felon
Manufacturer	Grumman Aerospace Sukhoi (UAC)
Country of Origin	United States Russia
Type / Role	Carrier-based air superiority & fleet defense fighter Stealth Air Superiority / Multirole Fighter
Generation	3rd–4th generation Fifth
Status	Retired (U.S.), Active (Iran) In limited service
First Flight	1970 January 29, 2010
Introduction / In Service Since	974 2020
Number Built	712 ~25 (as of 2025)
Operators	U.S. Navy (retired), Iran Russian Aerospace Forces

Dimensions & Structure

Length	62 ft 8 in 20.1 m
Wingspan	38–64 ft (variable) 14.1 m
Height	16 ft 4.6 m
Wing Area	565 sq ft 78.8 m²
Empty Weight	~43,735 lbs ~18,000 kg
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)	74,350 lbs 35,000 kg
Internal Weapons Bay	No dedicated bay Yes (2 main, 2 side)
External Hardpoints	10 6

Performance

Maximum Speed	Mach 2.34 Mach 2.0
Range	1,600+ miles 3,500 km
Combat Radius	~500 miles 1,500 km
Service Ceiling	50,000+ ft 20,000 m
Rate of Climb	~45,000 ft/min 330 m/s
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio	Up to 0.91 (F110 engines) ~1.15
G Limits	+7.5 +9

Powerplant

Engine Type	Turbofan Saturn AL-41F1 (future Izdeliye 30)
No. of Engines	2 2
Thrust (each)	20,900 lbf (F110 engines) 142 kN with afterburner
Thrust Vectoring	No Yes (3D)
Fuel Capacity	~16,200 lbs internal ~10,300 kg

Armament

Gun	20mm M61A1 Vulcan 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon
Missiles (Air-to-Air)	AIM-54 Phoenix, AIM-7 Sparrow, AIM-9 Sidewinder R-77, R-74M, R-37M
Missiles (Air-to-Ground)	LANTIRN-guided bombs (late service) Kh-38, Kh-59MK2
Bombs	JDAM, LGBs (late variants) KAB-250/500 guided bombs
Hardpoints	10 10 (internal + external)
Payload Capacity	~14,500 lbs 10,000 kg

Avionics & Systems

Radar	AN/AWG-9 N036 Byelka AESA
Radar Range	200+ miles 400+ km
Electronic Warfare (EW) System	ALR-67 RWR, ALQ-126 L402 Himalayas suite
Targeting System	LANTIRN (F-14B/D) IRST + radar fusion
Helmet Display	Basic HUD (no HMD) Integrated HMS
Navigation	INS/GPS (later upgrades) GLONASS-based INS
Autopilot / AI Assistance	Basic autopilot Partial autonomy
Communication	UHF/VHF, data link (later) Encrypted data link

Stealth & Technology

Radar Cross Section (RCS)	Large (non-stealth) Estimated 0.3–0.5 m²
Stealth Features	None Internal bays, radar-absorbing composites
Infrared Signature Reduction	Minimal Engine shielding, cooling design
Sensor Fusion	Limited Multi-source integration
Networking Capabilities	Upgraded in later variants Limited data-link interoperability

Variants

Special Export Versions

Limited; Iran received F-14A only Su-57E (Export Variant)

Operational History

Major Conflicts / Deployments	Desert Storm, Southern Watch, Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom Syria (testing), Ukraine (limited combat)
Notable Operators	U.S. Navy Russia
Combat Proven?	Yes Limited
Mission Types	Air superiority, fleet defense, escort, strike Air superiority, strike, reconnaissance

Cost & Program

Unit Cost	~$38 million (1998 dollars) ~$45–50 million (estimated)
Development Cost	~$1.9 billion ~$10 billion (PAK FA program)
Program Name	Naval Fighter Experimental (VFX) PAK FA (T-50)
Funding Countries	United States Russia

Additional Information

Upgrades Planned	None (retired) New radar, Izdeliye 30 engines
Future Replacement	F/A-18E/F Super Hornet None planned (Su-57M modernization)
Export Restrictions	Strict; only Iran received exports Controlled by Russian government
Notable Achievements	Longest-range AAM capability of its era Russia’s first fifth-gen stealth jet
Competitors	MiG-23/25, Su-27, F-15 F-22 Raptor, F-35 Lightning II, J-20 Mighty Dragon

Disclaimer Note

The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.