



| System Name | HMS Dragon (D35) |
| Type / Role | Air Defense Destroyer |
| Manufacturer | BAE Systems Maritime |
| Country of Origin | United Kingdom |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2012 |
| Unit Cost | ~$1.2–1.5 Billion |
| Crew | ~190 |
| Length | 152.4 m |
| Beam (Width) | 21.2 m |
| Draft | 7.4 m |
| Displacement | ~8,500 tons |
| Hull Material | Steel |
| Deck Configuration | Helicopter flight deck |
| Propulsion Type | Integrated Electric Propulsion |
| Engine Model | WR-21 Gas Turbine + Diesel Generators |
| Power Output | ~40 MW |
| Maximum Speed | 30+ knots |
| Range | ~7,000 nautical miles |
| Endurance | 45+ days |
| Primary Radar | SAMPSON AESA Radar |
| Radar Range | 400+ km |
| Sonar System | Hull-mounted sonar |
| Electro-Optical / IR System | Advanced EO targeting system |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | UAT Mod 2 |
| Fire Control Radar | Integrated with SAMPSON |
| Main Gun | 4.5-inch Mark 8 naval gun |
| Vertical Launch System (VLS) Cells | 48 Sylver A50 |
| Missiles | Aster 15 / Aster 30 |
| Anti-Ship Missiles | Limited (upgrade-dependent) |
| Anti-Submarine Torpedoes | Sting Ray torpedoes |
| Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) | Phalanx CIWS |
| Decoy Systems | Chaff and flare systems |
| Helicopter Capability | Yes |
| Hangar Capacity | 1 Merlin or Wildcat |
| UAV Operations | Limited |
| Flight Deck Size | Medium |
| Replenishment at Sea | Yes |
| Countermeasures | Decoys, ECM |
| ECM / ECCM | Advanced EW suite |
| Missile Defense System | Sea Viper |
| Combat Management System | PAAMS CMS |
| Communication Systems | NATO-compatible |
| Service Branch | Royal Navy |
| Primary Operator | United Kingdom |
| Operational History | Carrier escort, NATO missions |
| Notable Feature | Advanced long-range air defense system |
HMS Dragon is a modern air defense destroyer of the Royal Navy’s Type 45 class, designed to provide fleet-wide protection against advanced aerial threats. Built to counter high-speed missiles and aircraft, the platform represents the UK’s primary surface-based air defense capability. It combines advanced radar, missile systems, and integrated combat management to operate in high-threat maritime environments.
HMS Dragon (D35) was built by BAE Systems Maritime in the United Kingdom as part of the Type 45 destroyer program. It entered service in 2012 and serves as a core asset for British carrier strike groups and NATO maritime operations.
The vessel is powered by an integrated electric propulsion system using gas turbines and diesel generators. HMS Dragon can reach speeds exceeding 30 knots and has an operational range of approximately 7,000 nautical miles at cruising speed. Its endurance allows for extended deployments without frequent resupply.
The destroyer is equipped with the SAMPSON AESA radar and the Sea Viper air defense system. It carries up to 48 Sylver A50 vertical launch cells capable of firing Aster 15 and Aster 30 missiles for short- to long-range interception. Additional armament includes a 4.5-inch naval gun, Phalanx CIWS, and torpedo systems for close-range defense.
Each Type 45 destroyer, including HMS Dragon (D35), is estimated to cost around $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion, reflecting its advanced systems and air defense specialization.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More