- Home
- Defense Systems
- Compare
- HMS Dragon Type 45 Destroyer vs Arleigh Burke-class specs comparison
HMS Dragon Type 45 Destroyer vs Arleigh Burke-class specs comparison
1. General Information
|
System Name
|
HMS Dragon (D35)
Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer |
|
Type / Role
|
Air Defense Destroyer
Guided missile destroyer |
|
Manufacturer
|
BAE Systems Maritime
Bath Iron Works, Huntington Ingalls Industries |
|
Country of Origin
|
United Kingdom
United States |
|
In Service
|
Yes
Yes |
|
Year Introduced
|
2012
1991 |
|
Unit Cost
|
~$1.2–1.5 Billion
1.8 to 2.2 billion USD |
|
Crew
|
~190
Around 300 personnel |
2. Dimensions & Structure
|
Length
|
152.4 m
155 meters |
|
Beam (Width)
|
21.2 m
20 meters |
|
Draft
|
7.4 m
9.3 meters |
|
Displacement
|
~8,500 tons
Up to 9,200 tons |
|
Hull Material
|
Steel
Steel |
|
Deck Configuration
|
Helicopter flight deck
Flush deck design |
3. Performance & Propulsion
|
Propulsion Type
|
Integrated Electric Propulsion
Gas turbine |
|
Engine Model
|
WR-21 Gas Turbine + Diesel Generators
4 × General Electric LM2500 |
|
Power Output
|
~40 MW
Approx 100,000 shaft horsepower |
|
Maximum Speed
|
30+ knots
30 plus knots |
|
Range
|
~7,000 nautical miles
About 4,400 nautical miles |
|
Endurance
|
45+ days
Several months at sea |
4. Sensors & Radar Systems
|
Primary Radar
|
SAMPSON AESA Radar
AN SPY 1 or AN SPY 6 (Flight III) |
|
Radar Range
|
400+ km
300 plus km (air targets) |
|
Sonar System
|
Hull-mounted sonar
Hull mounted sonar and towed array |
|
Electro-Optical / IR System
|
Advanced EO targeting system
Yes |
|
Electronic Warfare Suite
|
UAT Mod 2
AN SLQ 32 |
|
Fire Control Radar
|
Integrated with SAMPSON
Mk 99 |
5. Weapons & Armament
|
Main Gun
|
4.5-inch Mark 8 naval gun
5 inch Mk 45 naval gun |
|
Vertical Launch System (VLS) Cells
|
48 Sylver A50
90 to 96 Mk 41 cells |
|
Missiles
|
Aster 15 / Aster 30
SM 2, SM 3, SM 6, Tomahawk |
|
Anti-Ship Missiles
|
Limited (upgrade-dependent)
Harpoon or Naval Strike Missile |
|
Anti-Submarine Torpedoes
|
Sting Ray torpedoes
Mk 46 or Mk 54 |
|
Close-In Weapon System (CIWS)
|
Phalanx CIWS
Phalanx CIWS or SeaRAM |
|
Decoy Systems
|
Chaff and flare systems
Chaff and flare launchers |
6. Aviation & Support
|
Helicopter Capability
|
Yes
Yes |
|
Hangar Capacity
|
1 Merlin or Wildcat
Two MH 60R helicopters |
|
UAV Operations
|
Limited
Limited |
|
Flight Deck Size
|
Medium
Full size flight deck |
|
Replenishment at Sea
|
Yes
Supported |
7. Defensive & Electronic Systems
|
Countermeasures
|
Decoys, ECM
Chaff, flares |
|
ECM / ECCM
|
Advanced EW suite
Integrated electronic warfare systems |
|
Missile Defense System
|
Sea Viper
Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense |
|
Combat Management System
|
PAAMS CMS
Aegis Combat System |
|
Communication Systems
|
NATO-compatible
Secure U.S. Navy data links |
8. Operational Information
|
Service Branch
|
Royal Navy
United States Navy |
|
Primary Operator
|
United Kingdom
United States |
|
Operational History
|
Carrier escort, NATO missions
Global combat and patrol deployments |
|
Notable Feature
|
Advanced long-range air defense system
Aegis missile and air defense capability |
Disclaimer Note
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.