- Home
- Defense Systems
- Compare
- MQ-9 Reaper vs Bayraktar TB2 Comparison
MQ-9 Reaper vs Bayraktar TB2 Comparison
1. General Information
|
Manufacturer
|
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems
Baykar Defense |
|
Country of Origin
|
United States
Turkey |
|
Type / Role
|
Attack / Multirole UAV
Tactical / Armed UAV |
|
First Flight / Introduced
|
2001
2014 |
|
Status
|
In Service
In Service |
|
Unit Cost
|
USD 16 Million (Approx.)
USD 5 Million (Approx.) |
2. Performance
|
Maximum Speed
|
480 km/h
220 km/h |
|
Cruise Speed
|
310 km/h
130 km/h |
|
Operational Range
|
1,850 km
300 km (LOS) |
|
Endurance
|
24 – 40 hours
27 hours |
|
Service Ceiling
|
50,000 ft
27,000 ft |
|
Rate of Climb
|
12 m/s
6.5 m/s |
3. Dimensions
|
Length
|
11 m
6.5 m |
|
Wingspan
|
20 m
12 m |
|
Height
|
3.8 m
2.2 m |
|
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)
|
4,760 kg
700 kg |
4. Payload & Armament
|
Payload Capacity
|
1,700 kg
150 kg |
|
Hardpoints
|
6
4 |
|
Weapons
|
AGM-114 Hellfire Missiles, Paveway II Bombs
MAM-L, MAM-C Smart Micro Munitions |
|
Sensors
|
EO/IR Sensor, Synthetic Aperture Radar, Laser Designator
EO/IR Camera, Laser Designator, ISR Suite |
|
Avionics
|
Satellite Link, GPS/INS Navigation, Targeting Pod
GPS/INS, Digital Flight Control System |
5. Propulsion
|
Engine Type
|
Honeywell TPE331-10 Turboprop
Rotax 912 Internal Combustion |
|
Engine Power
|
900 shp
100 hp |
|
Propeller Type
|
3-Blade Constant-Speed Propeller
Two-Blade Pusher Propeller |
6. Communication & Control
|
Control Type
|
Remote / Autonomous
Remote / Autonomous |
|
Data Link Range
|
200 km Line-of-Sight / Satellite Beyond LOS
300 km Line-of-Sight |
|
Navigation
|
GPS / INS
GPS / INS |
|
Ground Control Station
|
Portable or Fixed Facility
Mobile or Fixed Facility |
7. Operational Use
|
Primary Users
|
USAF, CIA, NATO, Italy, UK, France
Turkey, Ukraine, Poland, Qatar, Azerbaijan |
|
Combat Proven
|
Yes
Yes |
|
Notable Operations
|
Afghanistan, Syria, Libya
Syria, Libya, Nagorno-Karabakh, Ukraine |
Disclaimer Note
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.