- Home
- Defense Systems
- Compare
F-16 Fighting Falcon vs Su-35 Flanker-E Fighter Jet
General Information
|
Name
|
F-16 Fighting Falcon
Su-35 Flanker-E
|
|
Manufacturer
|
General Dynamics / Lockheed Martin
Sukhoi (United Aircraft Corporation)
|
|
Country of Origin
|
United States
Russia
|
|
Type / Role
|
Multirole Fighter
Multirole Air Superiority Fighter
|
|
Generation
|
4th
4++
|
|
Status
|
Active / In Service
Active Service
|
|
First Flight
|
January 20, 1974
February 19, 2008
|
|
Introduction / In Service Since
|
1978
2014
|
|
Number Built
|
Over 4,600
120+
|
|
Operators
|
USA, Israel, Turkey, Greece, South Korea, etc.
Russia, China, Egypt, Indonesia (pending)
|
Dimensions & Structure
|
Length
|
49 ft 5 in (15.06 m)
21.9 m
|
|
Wingspan
|
32 ft 8 in (9.96 m)
15.3 m
|
|
Height
|
16 ft 8 in (5.09 m)
5.9 m
|
|
Wing Area
|
300 sq ft (27.87 m²)
62 m²
|
|
Empty Weight
|
18,900 lb (8,573 kg)
18,400 kg
|
|
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)
|
42,300 lb (19,187 kg)
34,500 kg
|
|
Internal Weapons Bay
|
None
None
|
|
External Hardpoints
|
9
12
|
Performance
|
Maximum Speed
|
Mach 2.0
Mach 2.25 (2,400 km/h)
|
|
Range
|
2,620 mi (4,220 km) with drop tanks
3,600 km (ferry)
|
|
Combat Radius
|
~500 mi (800 km)
1,500 km
|
|
Service Ceiling
|
50,000 ft (15,240 m)
18,000 m
|
|
Rate of Climb
|
50,000 ft/min
280 m/s
|
|
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio
|
1.095
1.15
|
|
G Limits
|
+9 / -3
+9
|
Powerplant
|
Engine Type
|
Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 / GE F110-GE-129
Saturn AL-41F1S (117S)
|
|
No. of Engines
|
1
2
|
|
Thrust (each)
|
29,000 lbf (afterburner)
142 kN with afterburner
|
|
Thrust Vectoring
|
No
Yes (3D TVC)
|
|
Fuel Capacity
|
7,000 lb internal
~11,500 kg internal
|
Armament
|
Gun
|
1× M61A1 20mm Vulcan
1× 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon
|
|
Missiles (Air-to-Air)
|
AIM-9, AIM-120
R-77, R-27, R-73
|
|
Missiles (Air-to-Ground)
|
AGM-65, AGM-88
Kh-31, Kh-29, Kh-59
|
|
Bombs
|
JDAM, Paveway, Cluster bombs
FAB series, KAB precision-guided bombs
|
|
Hardpoints
|
9
12
|
|
Payload Capacity
|
17,000 lb (7,700 kg)
8,000 kg
|
Avionics & Systems
|
Radar
|
AN/APG-68 / AN/APG-83 AESA
Irbis-E PESA radar
|
|
Radar Range
|
~160 km
400 km (air targets)
|
|
Electronic Warfare (EW) System
|
AN/ALQ-213, ALQ-131
Khibiny-M
|
|
Targeting System
|
Sniper XR / LANTIRN
OLS-35 IRST
|
|
Helmet Display
|
JHMCS
Yes
|
|
Navigation
|
GPS/INS
GLONASS/INS
|
|
Autopilot / AI Assistance
|
Digital Fly-by-Wire
Digital flight control
|
|
Communication
|
Link 16, Secure UHF/VHF
Secure data link, VHF/UHF radio
|
Stealth & Technology
|
Radar Cross Section (RCS)
|
~1.2 m²
~1–3 m²
|
|
Stealth Features
|
Limited shaping, radar-absorbent coatings
Radar-absorbent coatings, composite materials
|
|
Infrared Signature Reduction
|
Moderate
Moderate (engine shielding)
|
|
Sensor Fusion
|
Partial (F-16V upgrade)
Limited
|
|
Networking Capabilities
|
Link 16, Joint operations compatible
Tactical data link
|
Variants
|
Special Export Versions
|
F-16I (Israel), KF-16 (South Korea)
Su-35SK (China), Su-35E (Egypt)
|
Operational History
|
Major Conflicts / Deployments
|
Gulf War, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan
Syria, Ukraine (limited combat use)
|
|
Notable Operators
|
USAF, Israel, Turkey, Taiwan, UAE
Russia, China, Egypt
|
|
Combat Proven?
|
Yes
Yes
|
|
Mission Types
|
Air superiority, strike, SEAD, CAS
Air superiority, interception, strike, escort
|
Cost & Program
|
Unit Cost
|
~$35 million (Block 70)
~$85 million (export)
|
|
Development Cost
|
~$8 billion (program total)
Estimated $1.5 billion
|
|
Program Name
|
Lightweight Fighter (LWF)
Su-35 Development Program
|
|
Funding Countries
|
United States, NATO partners
Russia
|
Additional Information
|
Upgrades Planned
|
AESA radar, datalink, EW suite
Radar and cockpit modernization
|
|
Future Replacement
|
F-35A Lightning II
Su-57 Felon
|
|
Export Restrictions
|
Controlled under ITAR
Russian arms control regulations
|
|
Notable Achievements
|
Most exported Western fighter
High agility and radar performance
|
|
Competitors
|
JAS 39 Gripen, MiG-29, Mirage 2000
F-15EX, Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon
|
Disclaimer Note
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.