

| Name | LGM-35A Sentinel |
| Designation | Sentinel |
| Manufacturer / Developer | Northrop Grumman |
| Country / Lead partner | United States |
| Type / Role | Intercontinental Ballistic Missile |
| Status | Development |
| Program Start | 2015 (GBSD phase) |
| Estimated unit cost | Not public, high strategic asset cost |
| Public Source / Reference | U.S. Air Force, Northrop Grumman |
| Operational Concept | Nuclear deterrence, rapid retaliatory strike |
| Effective Range / Engagement Envelope | 5,500+ km |
| Speed / Response Time | Mach 20+ class |
| Endurance / Sustained Operation | Continuous silo alert status |
| Precision / Accuracy | Improved over Minuteman III |
| Mobility / Basing | Fixed underground silos |
| Power Source | Solid rocket motors |
| Power Output | N/A |
| Propulsion Type | Multi-stage ballistic rocket |
| Fuel / Energy Storage | Solid propellant |
| Primary Effect | Nuclear |
| Payload Mass / Warhead | Classified |
| Guidance / Targeting | Inertial guidance, secure updates |
| Multi-mode Capability | Strategic strike |
| Sensors | Internal navigation systems |
| Autonomy Level | Human-in-loop launch authority |
| AI Features | Limited disclosed |
| Communications & Datalinks | Hardened strategic networks |
| Signature Reduction | N/A |
| Defensive Systems | Hardened silos |
| Resilience | EMP and cyber hardening |
| Integration | U.S. Strategic Command networks |
| Suitable Platforms | Land-based silos |
| Interoperability Standards | Classified |
| Upgrade Path | Modular digital architecture |
| Export Control | Not exportable |
| Legal/Ethical Flags | Nuclear escalation risk |
| Policy Implications | Strategic deterrence balance |
| Notable Tests / Milestones | Ongoing design and infrastructure milestones |
| Expected IOC (if given) | Late 2020s to early 2030s |
| Partners / Contractors | Northrop Grumman, USAF suppliers |
| Remarks | Schedule and cost remain key watchpoints |
The LGM-35A Sentinel is the next-generation land-based intercontinental ballistic missile being developed for the United States Air Force to replace the aging LGM-30G Minuteman III fleet. Designed as one leg of America’s nuclear triad, Sentinel will provide long-range strategic deterrence through the 21st century.
The missile is intended to modernize launch facilities, command systems, communications links, and warhead delivery capability. It represents one of the most important U.S. strategic defense programs currently underway.
Primary contractor Northrop Grumman leads missile design, systems integration, command network modernization, and deployment infrastructure. Multiple U.S. suppliers support propulsion, electronics, cybersecurity, and silo modernization.
The program was formerly known as Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) before receiving the Sentinel designation.
Sentinel is an intercontinental ballistic missile expected to exceed 5,500 km range, with practical strike reach far beyond that threshold. Like other ICBMs, it travels at hypersonic speeds above Mach 20 during portions of flight.
The missile uses advanced inertial guidance, hardened communications, secure launch authentication, and improved reliability compared with legacy Minuteman III systems.
The Sentinel program is among the largest U.S. strategic modernization efforts. Total acquisition and infrastructure costs are estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars over the life of the program. Recent Pentagon budget requests have included multi-billion-dollar annual funding lines, including roughly $4.6 billion requested for FY2026.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More