• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins $83.2 Million Contract Modification for Additional Army Hypersonic Missile Rounds
Defense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $83.2 Million Contract Modification for Additional Army Hypersonic Missile Rounds

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: September 7, 2026 5:50 am
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
2 Min Read
Lockheed Martin satellite contract
Lockheed Martin logo is seen in this illustration (Image Source : TheDefenseWatch)
SHARE
¦ KEY FACTS AT A GLANCE
  • Lockheed Martin Space received an $83.18 million contract modification to procure additional All Up Rounds for U.S. Army requirements.
  • The award supports the Navy-led Conventional Prompt Strike program, which shares key technologies with the Army’s Long Range Hypersonic Weapon.
  • Nearly $79.3 million in Army missile procurement funding was obligated immediately at contract award.
  • Production work will be distributed across Colorado, Utah, Alabama, Connecticut, New York, California, and other U.S. industrial sites.
  • The contract reinforces U.S. efforts to field operational hypersonic strike capabilities amid intensifying competition with China and Russia.

Lockheed Martin Space has been awarded an $83.18 million cost-plus-incentive-fee contract modification to procure additional hypersonic missile All Up Rounds (AURs) for the U.S. Army under the Navy’s Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) program.

Contents
Deep Technical & Strategic Context AnalysisContract Breakdown & DetailsContract ValuePurpose of the AwardFunding DetailsIndustrial Base DistributionProgram ScheduleWhy This Contract Matters

The award, announced by the U.S. Department of Defense, modifies contract N00030-22-C-1025 and was issued by Strategic Systems Programs (SSP), the Navy organization responsible for managing the nation’s sea-based strategic deterrent and the Conventional Prompt Strike initiative. The procurement will expand inventory available to the Army as the Pentagon continues transitioning hypersonic weapons from developmental testing into operational deployment.

The modification was awarded on a sole-source basis under 10 U.S. Code 3204(a)(1), which permits contracting without full competition when only one responsible source can satisfy government requirements.

Deep Technical & Strategic Context Analysis

The contract centers on the procurement of additional All Up Rounds, the complete missile assemblies intended for operational use rather than developmental components. Within the CPS architecture, these rounds incorporate the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB), a maneuverable hypersonic vehicle designed to travel at speeds exceeding Mach 5 while remaining capable of changing trajectory during flight. This maneuverability significantly complicates interception compared with traditional ballistic missiles.

- Advertisement -

The Navy’s Conventional Prompt Strike program and the Army’s Long Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW), also known as Dark Eagle, are closely linked through a common missile design and shared glide body technology. By leveraging a joint development approach, the Pentagon seeks to reduce costs, accelerate production, and create a common hypersonic strike ecosystem across multiple military services. The Army’s LRHW batteries and the Navy’s future ship and submarine based CPS launch systems are expected to provide commanders with the ability to engage high-value targets at long ranges with minimal warning time.

The use of a cost-plus-incentive-fee contract is notable because it reflects the technical complexity and ongoing maturation of hypersonic weapon production. Under this arrangement, the government reimburses allowable development and manufacturing costs while providing performance-based incentives tied to schedule, cost control, and technical outcomes. Such contract structures are common for advanced defense programs where production processes continue to evolve and technical risk remains significant.

Strategically, the award underscores the Pentagon’s determination to expand hypersonic inventories following years of intensive testing and capability demonstrations. U.S. military planners increasingly view hypersonic weapons as essential for penetrating sophisticated anti-access and area-denial networks developed by near-peer competitors, particularly in the Indo-Pacific theater. Additional missile procurement also indicates growing confidence in transitioning the capability toward sustained operational fielding.

Contract Breakdown & Details

Contract Value

  • Award Amount: $83,180,528
  • Contract Number: N00030-22-C-1025 (Modification P00093)
  • Prime Contractor: Lockheed Martin Space
  • Contract Type: Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF)
  • Contracting Agency: Strategic Systems Programs (SSP), Washington, D.C.
  • Acquisition Method: Sole-source procurement

Purpose of the Award

  • Procurement of additional All Up Rounds (AURs)
  • Supports U.S. Army operational requirements
  • Executed under the Navy’s Conventional Prompt Strike program
  • Expands inventory of deployable hypersonic missile systems

Funding Details

  • Funding Source: Fiscal Year 2025 Missile Procurement, Army Reconciliation Munitions funds
  • Amount Obligated at Award: $79,251,957
  • Expiration Status: Funds will remain available and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year

Industrial Base Distribution

Work will be performed across multiple facilities supporting the CPS industrial supply chain:

LocationShare of Work
Denver, Colorado31%
Magna, Utah26%
Cortland, Alabama14%
Simsbury, Connecticut10%
East Aurora, New York7%
Owego, New York7%
Sunnyvale, California2%
Other U.S. locations3%

Program Schedule

  • Expected Completion Date: June 30, 2029
  • Supports long-term production ramp-up and inventory growth for future Army hypersonic formations.

Why This Contract Matters

The latest modification highlights how the Pentagon is moving beyond experimental hypersonic testing and toward building meaningful stockpiles of operational weapons. While previous headlines surrounding the Conventional Prompt Strike and Dark Eagle programs largely focused on flight tests and developmental milestones, this award reflects a more practical phase centered on manufacturing capacity and inventory accumulation.

For Lockheed Martin, the contract further strengthens its position as a central industrial partner in America’s hypersonic weapons enterprise. For the U.S. military, additional missile procurement is a critical step toward creating a credible long-range conventional strike capability capable of rapidly engaging time-sensitive targets across contested regions.

As the United States seeks to match and eventually surpass advances made by China and Russia in hypersonic weapons deployment, production-focused awards such as this one may prove as strategically significant as the test launches that initially demonstrated the technology’s potential.

TAGGED:Defense contractsHypersonic weaponsLockheed Martin
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • China’s DF-61 ICBM Enters Routine PLA Rocket Force Training
  • Navy Awards $11.26 Million Contract for Undersea Acoustic Warfare Research
  • New York National Guard Opens $35 Million Housing Facility
  • Air Force, Secret Service Train Together to Strengthen Counter-Drone Defenses
  • General Atomics to Supply Components for U.S. Army and Navy Hypersonic Weapons

You Might Also Like

Mark IV-B weather program
Defense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $10.2 Million Contract Modification for Mark IV-B Weather Program

January 28, 2026
F135 engine sustainment contract
Defense Contracts

RTX Secures $42.1 Million Deal For F135 Engine Sustainment Supporting Global F-35 Fleet

September 7, 2026
Russian Shtil-1 missile deal
Defense Contracts

India Signs $238 Million Deal With Russia For Shtil-1 Missiles To Equip Indian Navy Frigates

September 8, 2026
Hanwha Aerospace credit rating
Asian Defense & SecurityDefense Contracts

Hanwha Aerospace Secures First S&P Global A+ Credit Rating As Defense Exports Drive Record Backlog

September 7, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?