| Name | A-10 Thunderbolt II (Warthog) |
| Manufacturer | Fairchild Republic |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Introduction / In Service Since | 1977 / Active |
| Status | Operational |
| Category | Close Air Support Aircraft |
| Crew | 1 |
| Unit Cost | Approx. $18 million |
| Length | 53 ft 4 in (16.16 m) |
| Wingspan | 57 ft 6 in (17.42 m) |
| Height | 14 ft 8 in (4.47 m) |
| Wing Area | 506 sq ft (47 m²) |
| Empty Weight | 24,959 lbs (11,321 kg) |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 50,000 lbs (22,680 kg) |
| Maximum Speed | 420 mph (676 km/h) |
| Range | 800 miles (1,287 km) |
| Combat Radius | 250 miles (400 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 45,000 ft (13,700 m) |
| Rate of Climb | 6,000 ft/min |
| Engine Type | 2 × General Electric TF34-GE-100A |
| Thrust (per engine) | 9,065 lbf |
| Total Thrust | 18,130 lbf |
| Internal Payload Capacity | 16,000 lbs |
| Weapons Bay | None (external hardpoints) |
| Compatible Weapons | GAU-8/A Avenger 30mm cannon, AGM-65 Maverick, Mk-82/84 bombs, rockets |
| Hardpoints | 11 total (8 underwing, 3 fuselage) |
| Radar System | None (uses targeting pods) |
| Navigation | GPS/INS |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) | AN/ALQ-131, AN/ALE-40 chaff/flare dispensers |
| Stealth Features | None |
| Primary Operator | United States Air Force |
| Conflict Usage | Gulf War, Iraq War, Afghanistan, Syria |
| Notable Missions | Operation Desert Storm, Enduring Freedom, Inherent Resolve |
| Variants | A-10A, A-10C |
| Successor / Future Replacement | Potentially F-35A (CAS role transition) |
| Notable Features | Titanium armor, GAU-8 cannon, redundant flight controls |
| Estimated Operational Life | Until 2040 (planned) |
The A-10 Thunderbolt II, affectionately known as the “Warthog,” stands as one of the most iconic and battle-proven aircraft in U.S. Air Force history. Developed by Fairchild Republic during the Cold War, the A-10 was designed specifically for close air support (CAS) missions—protecting ground forces by destroying tanks, armored vehicles, and fortified positions.
Introduced in the 1970s, the A-10’s rugged airframe, massive GAU-8/A Avenger 30mm cannon, and exceptional survivability set it apart from any other aircraft in its class. Its titanium “bathtub” armor protects the pilot from ground fire, and its twin General Electric TF34-GE-100 turbofan engines provide redundancy and reliability even under heavy damage.
With a combat range of over 250 miles, a top speed of 420 mph, and the ability to loiter over battle zones for extended periods, the Warthog remains unmatched in CAS operations. It can carry up to 16,000 pounds of ordnance, including AGM-65 Maverick missiles, rockets, and bombs.
Despite modernization debates, the A-10 continues to serve actively, thanks to upgrades in avionics, targeting pods, and digital cockpit systems. From the Gulf War to Operation Inherent Resolve, the A-10 has proven its effectiveness time and again.
The A-10 Thunderbolt II originally cost around $18 million per unit, though modern upgrade programs raise that figure. Its low maintenance cost and high combat effectiveness make it one of the most cost-efficient platforms in the U.S. Air Force arsenal.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More