


| System Name | USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62) |
| Type / Role | Guided Missile Destroyer |
| Manufacturer | Ingalls Shipbuilding |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 1995 |
| Unit Cost | ~$1.8 Billion |
| Crew | ~300 |
| Length | 154 m |
| Beam (Width) | 20 m |
| Draft | 9.3 m |
| Displacement | ~8,900 tons |
| Hull Material | Steel |
| Deck Configuration | Flush deck with helipad |
| Propulsion Type | Gas Turbine (COGAG) |
| Engine Model | GE LM2500 |
| Power Output | ~100,000 shp |
| Maximum Speed | 30+ knots |
| Range | 4,400 nautical miles |
| Endurance | 30+ days |
| Primary Radar | AN/SPY-1D |
| Radar Range | 300+ km |
| Sonar System | AN/SQS-53C |
| Electro-Optical / IR System | Yes |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | AN/SLQ-32 |
| Fire Control Radar | SPG-62 |
| Main Gun | 5-inch Mk 45 |
| Vertical Launch System (VLS) Cells | 90 |
| Missiles | SM-2, SM-3, Tomahawk, ASROC |
| Anti-Ship Missiles | Harpoon |
| Anti-Submarine Torpedoes | Mk 46 / Mk 54 |
| Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) | Phalanx |
| Decoy Systems | Nulka, chaff, flares |
| Helicopter Capability | MH-60R Seahawk |
| Hangar Capacity | 1–2 helicopters |
| UAV Operations | Limited |
| Flight Deck Size | Medium |
| Replenishment at Sea | Yes |
| Countermeasures | Chaff, flares, decoys |
| ECM / ECCM | AN/SLQ-32 |
| Missile Defense System | Aegis BMD |
| Combat Management System | Aegis Combat System |
| Communication Systems | Advanced naval comms |
| Service Branch | U.S. Navy |
| Primary Operator | United States |
| Operational History | Indo-Pacific ops |
| Notable Feature | Aegis missile defense |
USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62) is a multi-mission guided missile destroyer of the Arleigh Burke class, designed to deliver air defense, surface warfare, and anti-submarine capabilities. Commissioned into the U.S. Navy in 1995, the vessel plays a central role in forward-deployed naval operations, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. Equipped with the Aegis Combat System, Fitzgerald is built to detect, track, and engage multiple threats simultaneously in complex combat environments.
The ship was built by Ingalls Shipbuilding, a division of Huntington Ingalls Industries, in the United States. It reflects the proven design philosophy of the Arleigh Burke-class, prioritizing survivability, firepower, and adaptability.
Powered by four General Electric LM2500 gas turbines, USS Fitzgerald can reach speeds exceeding 30 knots (approximately 56 km/h). The ship has an operational range of about 4,400 nautical miles at cruising speed, enabling sustained deployments without frequent resupply.
The estimated unit cost of an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer like USS Fitzgerald is approximately $1.8 billion, depending on configuration and upgrades.
Fitzgerald features the AN/SPY-1D phased array radar, integrated with the Aegis system, allowing advanced missile defense operations. Its Mk 41 Vertical Launch System supports a wide range of missiles, including Tomahawk cruise missiles, Standard surface-to-air missiles, and ASROC anti-submarine weapons. The ship also carries a 5-inch naval gun, torpedoes, and a Phalanx CIWS for close-range defense.
The destroyer supports helicopter operations, typically deploying MH-60R Seahawk helicopters for anti-submarine and surveillance missions.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More