


| Ship Type | Aircraft Carrier |
| Class | Fujian-class |
| Length | ~316 m |
| Beam (Width) | ~76 m |
| Flight Deck Width | ~78–80 |
| Draft | ~10–11 m |
| Displacement (Full Load) | ~80,000+ tons |
| Propulsion Type | Conventional |
| Powerplant | Gas turbines + auxiliary systems |
| Shafts | 4 shafts |
| Maximum Speed | 30+ knots |
| Range | 8,000–12,000+ nm |
| Endurance | 45–70 days |
| Aircraft Launch System | CATOBAR |
| Catapult Type | EMALS |
| Recovery System | Arresting gear |
| Total Aircraft Capacity | 60–80+ |
| Hangar Capacity | Full-length hangar |
| Aircraft Types Supported | J-35, J-15, KJ-600 AEW, helos |
| Primary Radar | AESA multifunction |
| Navigation Radar | Standard naval navigation radar |
| Fire Control Radar | CIWS & SAM support |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | ECM, ESM, jammers |
| Communication Systems | SATCOM, secure data links |
| CIWS | Type 1130 |
| Short-Range SAMs | HQ-10 |
| Missile Launchers | Limited surface-defense |
| Decoy Systems | Chaff & EW decoys |
| Combat Management System | Integrated CMS |
| Combat Information Center (CIC) | Central command hub |
| Air Operations Center | Flight operations management |
| Data Links | SATCOM + secure tactical links |
| Ship Crew | ~2,500 personnel |
| Air Wing Personnel | ~1,000+ |
| Total Complement | 3,000–4,000+ |
| Shipbuilder/Manufacturer | CSSC (China) |
| Construction Started | 2015–2016 (est.) |
| Commissioned | 2024–2025 (expected) |
| Estimated Cost | ~$5–9B (conventional) |
The Fujian (CV-18) represents China’s most ambitious leap in aircraft carrier development, marking a major shift toward U.S.-style high-end naval aviation. As the first Chinese carrier equipped with Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) technology, Fujian signals the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is moving beyond STOBAR limitations and toward CATOBAR capabilities similar to the U.S. Navy’s Ford-class carriers.
Constructed by China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) and launched in 2022, Fujian serves as the lead ship of China’s next-generation carrier class. Built for extended blue-water operations, it supports China’s efforts to increase regional power projection and expand its presence in contested zones such as the Western Pacific.
Fujian features a flat-top design with three EMALS catapults and advanced arresting gear, allowing it to launch heavier, fully fueled aircraft including the J-35 stealth fighter, KJ-600 AEW aircraft, and enhanced strike platforms. Its integrated island is equipped with AESA multifunction radars, modern battle-management systems, and improved electronic-warfare suites.
Powered by a conventional (non-nuclear) propulsion system, Fujian is expected to reach speeds above 30 knots with operational endurance comparable to major global carrier classes. Its full-load displacement—estimated at over 80,000 tons—positions it among the world’s largest conventionally powered carriers.
Once fully operational, Fujian will provide the PLAN with greater sortie rates, better fixed-wing support operations, and sophisticated airborne early warning capabilities. While it lacks the global reach of U.S. nuclear carriers, Fujian marks China’s strongest step toward a modern blue-water carrier force.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More