

| System Name | Advanced Extremely High Frequency Satellite |
| Manufacturer | Lockheed Martin |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Type / Role | Secure Military Communications Satellite |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2010 |
| Unit Cost | USD 1.8 to 2.1 Billion Estimated |
| Orbit Type | Geostationary Earth Orbit |
| Operational Altitude | About 35,786 km |
| Operational Inclination | Near zero degrees |
| Imaging / Sensor Type | Protected SATCOM |
| Resolution / Accuracy | Up to ten times Milstar capacity |
| Revisit Time / Coverage | Global excluding extreme polar regions |
| Mission Duration | Fifteen years or more |
| Data Transmission | Encrypted military SATCOM |
| Payload Weight | Classified |
| Onboard Power | Large solar arrays multi kilowatt |
| Attitude Control System | Reaction wheels and thrusters |
| Orbit Control | Chemical propulsion |
| Communication Link | EHF and Ka band |
| Data Encryption | Military grade encryption |
| Telemetry & Command System | Secure Space Force ground network |
| Launch Vehicle | Atlas V |
| Launch Site | Cape Canaveral |
| Deployment Orbit | GEO |
| Launch Mass | About 6,000 kg |
| Deployment Method | Direct injection to orbit |
| Primary Operators | United States Space Force |
| Global Coverage | UK Canada Netherlands |
| Combat Proven | Yes |
| Typical Missions | Nuclear command control secure comms |
| Notable Feature | Nuclear survivable communications |
| Planned Upgrades | Transition to Evolved Strategic SATCOM |
| Replacement / Next Gen | ESS system |
| Experimental Variants | Improved cyber resilience |
| International Collaboration | Limited allied participation |
The Advanced Extremely High Frequency satellite, known as AEHF, is the backbone of the United States most secure military communications network. It is built to keep commanders connected even during nuclear conflict, cyber attacks, or heavy electronic jamming.
Developed by Lockheed Martin with payload support from Northrop Grumman, AEHF is a U.S. strategic satellite system operated by the U.S. Space Force. The program replaces the older Milstar satellites and delivers much higher data rates, stronger protection, and wider global reach.
AEHF Secure Communication Satellite supports national command authorities, nuclear forces, missile defense units, aircraft, ships, and ground forces. It provides protected voice, data, and video links across the globe. The system is designed to survive nuclear effects and operate in highly contested space environments.
AEHF satellites operate in geostationary orbit, allowing constant coverage of large regions. They use Extremely High Frequency and Ka band communications, combined with advanced encryption and anti jam technology. Each satellite can handle much more traffic than Milstar, while serving more users at once.
The system supports real time command and control, secure targeting data, and strategic messaging. AEHF terminals are used on bombers, submarines, surface ships, mobile ground units, and command centers.
Since entering service in 2010, AEHF Secure Communication Satellite has been a critical asset for U.S. and allied forces. Partner nations include the United Kingdom, Canada, and the Netherlands, which access the system under formal agreements.
The estimated cost of one AEHF satellite is between USD 1.8 and 2.1 billion. This includes advanced payloads, nuclear hardening, encryption systems, and launch support. The high cost reflects its strategic role and unmatched survivability.
It provides secure military communications during normal operations and nuclear conflict.
Yes, it is designed to operate under heavy electronic attack.
Geostationary Earth orbit.
The United States Space Force.
Yes, selected U.S. allies have access agreements.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More