


| System Name | Hobart-class Destroyer |
| Type / Role | Air Warfare Destroyer |
| Manufacturer | ASC Pty Ltd / Navantia |
| Country of Origin | Australia |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2017 |
| Unit Cost | ~$2 billion |
| Crew | ~180 personnel |
| Length | 147 m |
| Beam (Width) | 18.6 m |
| Draft | 5.2 m |
| Displacement | ~7,000 tons |
| Hull Material | Steel |
| Deck Configuration | Helicopter flight deck with hangar |
| Propulsion Type | CODOG |
| Engine Model | Gas turbine + diesel engines |
| Power Output | ~48,000 shp |
| Maximum Speed | 28+ knots |
| Range | ~5,000 nautical miles |
| Endurance | Extended deployments |
| Primary Radar | AN/SPY-1D(V) |
| Radar Range | 300+ km |
| Sonar System | Hull-mounted sonar |
| Electro-Optical / IR System | Integrated EO/IR sensors |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | Advanced EW system |
| Fire Control Radar | Aegis-integrated |
| Main Gun | 127mm naval gun |
| Vertical Launch System (VLS) Cells | 48 |
| Missiles | SM-2, ESSM |
| Anti-Ship Missiles | Harpoon |
| Anti-Submarine Torpedoes | Lightweight torpedoes |
| Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) | Phalanx CIWS |
| Decoy Systems | Chaff and flare systems |
| Helicopter Capability | MH-60R Seahawk |
| Hangar Capacity | 1 helicopter |
| UAV Operations | Limited capability |
| Flight Deck Size | Medium |
| Replenishment at Sea | Yes |
| Countermeasures | Decoys, ECM |
| ECM / ECCM | Integrated EW suite |
| Missile Defense System | Aegis Combat System |
| Combat Management System | Aegis |
| Communication Systems | Secure naval comms |
| Service Branch | Royal Australian Navy |
| Primary Operator | Australia |
| Operational History | Indo-Pacific deployments |
| Notable Feature | Aegis-based air defense |
The Hobart-class destroyer is a modern air warfare platform designed to provide layered air and missile defense for naval task groups. Built for the Royal Australian Navy, it combines advanced radar, long-range missile systems, and integrated combat management to counter evolving aerial and maritime threats. Based on the Spanish Álvaro de Bazán-class design, the Hobart-class is optimized for fleet protection, escort missions, and power projection across contested maritime environments.
The destroyer was developed by the Air Warfare Destroyer Alliance, led by ASC Pty Ltd, Raytheon Australia, and Navantia. Spain’s Navantia provided the core design, while Australian industry contributed to construction and system integration. This collaboration reflects a hybrid approach, combining proven European shipbuilding expertise with U.S.-aligned combat systems.
Powered by a combined diesel or gas (CODOG) propulsion system, the Hobart-class reaches speeds exceeding 28 knots. It has an operational range of approximately 5,000 nautical miles, enabling sustained deployments across the Indo-Pacific. Its endurance supports extended missions without frequent resupply, critical for long-distance maritime operations.
Each Hobart-class destroyer is estimated to cost around $2 billion per unit. The price reflects its advanced Aegis Combat System, SPY-1D(V) radar, vertical launch systems, and multi-role capabilities. While expensive, the platform delivers high-end air defense comparable to U.S. Navy destroyers.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More