


| Name | MiG 31K |
| Manufacturer | Mikoyan Design Bureau |
| Country of Origin | Russia |
| Type / Role | Long range interceptor and strike aircraft |
| Generation | Fourth |
| Status | Active |
| First Flight | Based on MiG 31 platform |
| Introduction / In Service Since | Late 2010s |
| Number Built | Limited conversion batch |
| Operators | Russian Aerospace Forces |
| Length | 22.7 m |
| Wingspan | 13.5 m |
| Height | 6.15 m |
| Wing Area | 61.6 sq m |
| Empty Weight | Approx 21,800 kg |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | Approx 46,200 kg |
| Internal Weapons Bay | No |
| External Hardpoints | Yes |
| Maximum Speed | Mach 2.8 |
| Range | Approx 3000 km |
| Combat Radius | 1000 km plus |
| Service Ceiling | 20,600 m |
| Rate of Climb | 208 m per second |
| Thrust-to-Weight Ratio | Approx 0.8 |
| G Limits | Plus 5 G |
| Engine Type | Soloviev D 30F6 turbofan |
| No. of Engines | 2 |
| Thrust (each) | 152 kN with afterburner |
| Thrust Vectoring | No |
| Fuel Capacity | Internal |
| Gun | Not standard |
| Missiles (Air-to-Air) | Limited defensive fit |
| Missiles (Air-to-Ground) | Kh 47M2 Kinzhal |
| Bombs | No |
| Hardpoints | 1 primary |
| Payload Capacity | Approx 4000 kg |
| Radar | Zaslon AM PESA |
| Radar Range | Up to 320 km |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) System | Integrated ECM |
| Targeting System | Missile support suite |
| Helmet Display | Limited |
| Navigation | Inertial and satellite |
| Autopilot / AI Assistance | Conventional |
| Communication | Secure military datalinks |
| Radar Cross Section (RCS) | Large |
| Stealth Features | None |
| Infrared Signature Reduction | Minimal |
| Sensor Fusion | Limited |
| Networking Capabilities | Tactical links |
| Special Export Versions | MiG 31B, MiG 31BM, MiG 31K |
| Major Conflicts / Deployments | Ukraine related operations |
| Notable Operators | Russia |
| Combat Proven? | Yes |
| Mission Types | Long range strike |
| Unit Cost | Estimated 35 to 50 million USD |
| Development Cost | Not disclosed |
| Program Name | MiG 31K |
| Funding Countries | Russia |
| Upgrades Planned | Avionics updates |
| Future Replacement | None announced |
| Export Restrictions | Not for export |
| Notable Achievements | Hypersonic missile launch platform |
| Competitors | None direct |
The MiG 31K is a specialized strike variant of the MiG 31 interceptor, adapted to deliver Russia’s Kh 47M2 Kinzhal hypersonic missile. Built for speed and altitude rather than air combat agility, the aircraft plays a niche but strategic role. Its mission is to launch long range precision or nuclear strikes while remaining outside most enemy air defense coverage.
The aircraft is produced by the Mikoyan Design Bureau of Russia. The MiG 31K is a conversion of existing MiG 31 airframes, primarily upgraded from the MiG 31BM standard. Russia introduced the MiG 31K into operational service in the late 2010s to support its air launched hypersonic strike doctrine.
Speed is the MiG 31K’s defining strength. Powered by two D 30F6 turbofan engines, it can reach speeds close to Mach 2.8 at high altitude. This allows the aircraft to rapidly deploy across vast distances and provide the Kinzhal missile with additional launch energy. Ferry range is roughly 3000 km, while combat radius varies by load and profile but exceeds most modern fighters.
Unlike multirole fighters, the MiG 31K is optimized for a single task. It typically carries one Kinzhal missile on a reinforced centerline hardpoint. The aircraft uses the Zaslon AM radar and updated navigation systems to support long range missions. It is assessed to be nuclear capable, giving it strategic deterrence value.
Since the MiG 31K is a modified aircraft rather than a new build, precise unit cost figures are unclear. Western estimates suggest conversion and upgrade costs in the range of 35 to 50 million USD per aircraft, excluding missile costs.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More