| System Name | TOR-M2 / TOR-M2K |
| Manufacturer | Almaz-Antey |
| Country of Origin | Russia |
| Type / Role | Short-Range Mobile SAM System |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2010 |
| Unit Cost | USD 10–15 Million per Battery |
| Maximum Engagement Range | 15–20 km |
| Maximum Engagement Altitude | 10 km |
| Target Types | Aircraft, Helicopters, UAVs, Cruise Missiles |
| Interception Probability | 80–90% (Short-Range Threats) |
| Reaction Time | 5–10 seconds |
| Radar Detection Range | 25 km |
| Missile Type | 9M330 / 9M338 |
| Missile Length | 3.9 m |
| Missile Weight | 170 kg |
| Warhead Type | Fragmentation / Proximity Fuse |
| Warhead Weight | 50 kg |
| Speed | Mach 2.5+ |
| Radar Type | Phased-Array Fire Control Radar |
| Radar Name | 9S32ME |
| Detection Range | 25 km |
| Tracking Capacity | 48+ Targets |
| Guidance System | Command + Radar Homing |
| Fire Control System | Automated Digital Fire Control |
| Launcher Type | Mobile / Truck-Mounted |
| No. of Missiles per Launcher | 8–16 |
| Reload Time | 15–30 minutes |
| Mobility Platform | MAZ-6317 / Tatra 8x8 |
| Crew Required | 3–4 personnel |
| C2 System | Integrated Battle Management Network |
| Connectivity | Secure Data Link / Satellite Link |
| Network Capability | Yes, Multi-Layer Integration |
| Operation Mode | Autonomous / Networked / Manual Override |
| Primary Operator | Russia, Algeria, Syria, India |
| Combat Proven | Yes |
| Conflict History | Syria, Ukraine, Middle East |
| Notable Feature | Rapid, mobile short-range air defense |
The TOR-M2/TOR-M2K Defense System represents Russia’s latest evolution in mobile, short-range air defense technology, engineered to protect military units, strategic installations, and mobile formations from aerial threats. Developed by Almaz-Antey, the TOR-M2 series builds upon the proven TOR-M1 platform, integrating advanced radar, missile, and fire control systems for rapid detection and engagement of modern air threats.
Designed and produced by Almaz-Antey in Russia, the TOR-M2/TOR-M2K system is a highly mobile, truck-mounted air defense solution. The “K” variant emphasizes enhanced command, control, and connectivity, making it suitable for networked battlefield operations.
The TOR-M2 is designed to intercept a wide array of threats, including fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, UAVs, precision-guided munitions, and cruise missiles. With an engagement range of up to 15–20 km and altitude coverage up to 10 km, the system can track and engage multiple targets simultaneously. Its phased-array radar allows all-weather, day-night operation with high-speed target acquisition and automated fire control.
The system is equipped with 8 ready-to-launch 9M330 or upgraded 9M338 missiles, capable of speeds exceeding Mach 2.5. Its integrated radar and electro-optical systems ensure autonomous operation or coordination within a larger air defense network. Rapid reload times and truck-mounted mobility enhance survivability and deployment flexibility.
TOR-M2/TOR-M2K has been deployed in multiple global theaters, including Eastern Europe and the Middle East, proving highly effective against UAVs and low-flying missile threats. Its compact, mobile design makes it ideal for frontline units requiring immediate, short-range protective coverage.
The TOR-M2/TOR-M2K Defense System is estimated to cost between $10–15 million per battery, depending on configuration, missile loadout, and additional support equipment. Prices vary based on export agreements and training packages.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More