


| Name / Class | Kilo Class Project 877 |
| Country of Origin | Russia |
| Type | Diesel electric attack submarine |
| Manufacturer | Rubin Design Bureau Admiralty Shipyards |
| Operators | Russia, China, India, Iran, Algeria, Vietnam |
| In Service | 1982 |
| Status | Active and upgraded variants in service |
| Length | 72.6 meters |
| Beam (Width) | 9.9 meters |
| Draught / Draft | 6.2 meters |
| Displacement (Surfaced) | 2300 tons |
| Displacement (Submerged) | 3000 tons |
| Hull Material | High tensile steel |
| Crew | 52 |
| Power Source | Diesel electric |
| Engine / Reactor Type | Diesel generators electric motor |
| Propulsion System | Single shaft propeller |
| Speed (Surfaced) | 10 knots |
| Speed (Submerged) | 17 knots |
| Range | 6000 nautical miles |
| Endurance | 45 days |
| Operational Depth | 240 meters |
| Test Depth | 300 meters |
| Maximum Depth | 300 meters |
| Torpedo Tubes | 6 x 533 mm |
| Torpedoes / Missiles | Heavyweight torpedoes anti ship missiles |
| Cruise / Ballistic Missiles | Land attack capable on later variants |
| Mines | Up to 24 |
| Decoys / Countermeasures | Acoustic decoys |
| Sonar System | MGK series sonar suite |
| Radar | Navigation radar |
| Combat Management System | Integrated Russian CMS |
| Electronic Warfare System | ESM and ECM suite |
| Communication Systems | HF VHF satellite comms |
| Navigation Systems | Inertial and satellite navigation |
| Anechoic Coating | Yes |
| Noise Reduction Features | Raft mounted machinery |
| Magnetic Signature Reduction | Degaussing systems |
| Acoustic Signature Level | Very low for convention |
| Weapons Payload | Torpedoes missiles mines |
| Special Forces Accommodation | Limited |
| UUV / Drone Capability | Not standard |
| Reactor / AIP Type | None diesel electric |
| Automation Level | Moderate |
| Special Features | Quiet propulsion optimized hull |
| Major Deployments | Black Sea Mediterranean Indo Pacific |
| Combat / Exercises | Regular multinational exercises |
| Upgrades | Improved sonar missile integration |
| Unit Cost | 250 to 350 million USD |
| Number Built | Over 60 |
| Production Period | 1980s to early 2000s |
| Image / Video Source | Public domain naval imagery |
| Official Website | Design Bureau |
| Reference Credit | Open source defense publications |
The Kilo class submarine is one of the most widely exported conventional submarines in modern naval history. Designed during the Cold War, it remains relevant due to its stealth focused design and proven combat reliability. Western navies long referred to it as a black hole because of its low acoustic signature in littoral waters.
The Kilo class was developed by the Rubin Design Bureau and built primarily at Admiralty Shipyards in Russia. Introduced in the early 1980s, it was intended as a coastal and regional sea denial platform for the Soviet Navy. Over time, upgraded variants expanded its mission set and export appeal.
This submarine is optimized for anti ship and anti submarine warfare. It is also capable of intelligence gathering, mine laying, and special forces insertion. Operating on diesel electric propulsion, the Kilo class prioritizes quiet movement over raw speed, making it effective in choke points and shallow seas.
The Kilo class reaches speeds of around 17 knots submerged and has an operational range exceeding 6000 nautical miles on diesel power. It is armed with six forward torpedo tubes capable of launching heavyweight torpedoes, anti ship cruise missiles, and naval mines. Later variants support land attack cruise missiles, increasing strategic value.
Kilo class submarines are operated by several U.S. strategic competitors and partners, including Russia, China, India, and Iran. They have been deployed in the Black Sea, Mediterranean, and Indo Pacific regions, where their stealth poses challenges to NATO naval forces.
There is no direct purchase price for the Kilo class submarine in the United States, as it is not operated or procured by the U.S. Navy. However, international unit costs are estimated between 250 and 350 million USD depending on configuration, weapons, and support packages. U.S. analysts often reference this cost range when comparing foreign diesel electric submarine capabilities to American nuclear powered platforms.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More