


| Name / Designation | B61 Nuclear Bomb |
| Type | Nuclear Gravity Bomb |
| Manufacturer | Los Alamos National Laboratory / NNSA |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Year Introduced | Late 1960s |
| Operational Status | Active, Modernized Variants in Service |
| Weight | Approx. 700 lbs |
| Length | ~11.8 ft |
| Diameter | ~13 inches |
| Casing Type | Aerodynamic metal casing |
| Yield | Variable (publicly acknowledged) |
| Guidance | Tail-kit guidance (B61-12) |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Improved CEP with guided variant |
| Delivery Platforms | F-15E, F-16, F-35A (pending), B-2 |
| Penetration Capability | Yes (specific variants only) |
| Warhead Type | Nuclear |
| Fuzing Options | Airburst / Groundburst |
| Explosive Composition | Not publicly disclosed |
| Primary Mission | Tactical & strategic nuclear deterrence |
| Operators | United States; NATO sharing arrangements |
| Notable Deployments / History | Cold War to present; ongoing modernization programs |
| Variants | B61-3, B61-4, B61-7, B61-11, B61-12 |
The B61 nuclear gravity bomb remains one of the most enduring and strategically significant components of the United States’ nuclear deterrent. Developed during the Cold War and continuously modernized, the B61 series is designed to provide flexible, precise, and survivable nuclear strike capability for U.S. and NATO aircraft.
Manufactured by the Los Alamos National Laboratory and later enhanced through the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) life extension programs, the B61 was first introduced in the late 1960s. Over the decades, it has evolved into multiple variants tailored for tactical, strategic, and earth-penetrating missions. The newest modernization effort—the B61-12—adds precision-guided tail-kit upgrades to enhance accuracy while consolidating older variants into a single standardized model.
Engineered for compatibility with a wide array of aircraft, the B61 can be deployed from platforms such as the F-15E, F-16, B-2 Spirit, and future F-35A nuclear-certified units. Its variable-yield configuration allows military planners to adjust explosive power for mission needs, enhancing flexibility across both deterrence and extended security commitments to NATO partners.
The B61 features a streamlined, lightweight design, enabling high-speed deployment under a variety of mission profiles. Its precision guidance system in the modernized variants significantly improves accuracy, reducing potential collateral effects compared to earlier unguided gravity bombs.

Operationally, the B61 plays a central role within the U.S. strategic triad, particularly in the air-delivered leg. It is forward-deployed at select NATO bases under strict security and international oversight, contributing to alliance deterrence strategies.
The B61 series does not have a conventional commercial price. Costs are associated with government-funded nuclear modernization programs, with the B61-12 Life Extension Program valued at several billion dollars over multiple years.
The B61 provides tactical and strategic nuclear strike capability for U.S. and NATO aircraft.
Yes. Multiple variants remain operational, with the B61-12 serving as the modernized replacement.
Platforms include the F-15E, F-16, B-2, and future F-35A nuclear-certified units.
Yes, the U.S. maintains forward-deployed B61 units at select NATO bases under strict control.
The B61-12 adds precision guidance and consolidates older variants to improve reliability and accuracy.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More