


| Name / Designation | R-60 (AA-8 Aphid) |
| Type / Role | Short-Range Air-to-Air Missile |
| Country of Origin | Soviet Union |
| Manufacturer | Molniya Design Bureau |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | 1974 |
| Operational Status | Active in Multiple Countries |
| Range | Up to 8 km (Short Range) |
| Speed | Approx. Mach 2.5 |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | Typically 0–20,000 m (Platform Dependent) |
| Accuracy (CEP) | N/A (Proximity-fused AAM) |
| Warhead Type | HE-Fragmentation |
| Guidance System | Infrared Homing |
| Targeting Mode | Fire-and-Forget |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | Fighter Jets (MiG/Su Series) |
| Seeker Type | IR Seeker / Improved IR (R-60M) |
| Length | ~2.1 m |
| Diameter | ~0.12 m |
| Wingspan | ~0.39 m |
| Launch Weight | 43–45 kg |
| Propulsion | Solid-Fuel Rocket |
| Warhead Weight | ~3.5 kg |
| Explosive Type | HE-Fragmentation |
| Detonation Mechanism | Proximity / Impact Fuse |
| Payload Options | Single HE Payload |
| Operational Range Type | Short Range |
| Deployment Platform | Air-Launched |
| Target Types | Fighters, UAVs, Helicopters |
| Combat Proven | Yes |
| Users / Operators | Russia, India, Syria, Ukraine, Several Export Nations |
The R-60 is one of the most recognizable short-range air-to-air missiles developed during the Cold War, designed to give Soviet fighter aircraft a compact, agile, and rapid-reaction weapon for close-range engagements. Known by NATO as the AA-8 “Aphid,” the missile remains in service with several air forces and has seen extensive operational use across multiple conflicts.
Developed by the Soviet Union’s Molniya Design Bureau, the R-60 was introduced in the mid-1970s to equip fighters such as the MiG-21, MiG-23, MiG-29, and Su-27. Its purpose was clear: provide a highly maneuverable heat-seeking missile capable of striking fast-moving airborne targets at short distances.
The standard R-60 features an infrared homing seeker, enabling true fire-and-forget performance. Its compact airframe—under 45 kg—allows aircraft to carry multiple missiles without compromising agility. With a typical engagement range of up to 8 km, the R-60 excels in dogfight scenarios where rapid lock-on and high maneuverability are essential.
The missile’s fragmentation warhead is designed to maximize effectiveness against fighters, UAVs, and low-altitude airborne threats. Upgraded versions, including the R-60M, offer improved seekers, better countermeasure resistance, and an expanded engagement envelope.
Throughout its service life, the R-60 has been used in numerous regional conflicts, proving reliable in harsh environments. It remains compatible with many legacy and modernized aircraft in Asia, Eastern Europe, Africa, and the Middle East.
For U.S. defense observers, the R-60 remains relevant due to its widespread presence in global inventories and its role in shaping close-range air-combat doctrine among non-NATO operators.
While pricing varies due to age, export history, and refurbishment status, R-60 missiles typically fall into the low-cost short-range missile category, making them inexpensive compared to modern Western equivalents. Exact U.S. market values depend on availability through allied inventories or decommissioned stock.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More