

| System Name | Tor-E2 |
| Manufacturer | Almaz-Antey |
| Country of Origin | Russia |
| Type / Role | Short-Range Air Defense System (SHORAD) |
| In Service | Yes (Limited Export) |
| Year Introduced | 2016 |
| Unit Cost | USD 25–35 Million (Estimated) |
| Maximum Engagement Range | 15 km |
| Maximum Engagement Altitude | 10 km |
| Target Types | UAVs, PGMs, Aircraft, Cruise Missiles, Helicopters |
| Interception Probability | 70–90% (Depending on target type) |
| Reaction Time | 8–12 seconds |
| Radar Detection Range | 32–40 km |
| Missile Type | 9M338K / 9M331 Missiles |
| Missile Length | ~2.9 m |
| Missile Weight | ~165 kg |
| Warhead Type | HE-fragmentation |
| Warhead Weight | ~15 kg |
| Speed | Mach 2.5 |
| Radar Type | Pulse-Doppler Search & Tracking Radar |
| Radar Name | Tor-E2 Integrated Radar |
| Detection Range | 32–40 km |
| Tracking Capacity | Up to 48 Targets |
| Guidance System | Command Guidance |
| Fire Control System | Fully Automated Fire Control |
| Launcher Type | Self-Propelled (Tracked/8x8) |
| No. of Missiles per Launcher | 16 |
| Reload Time | ~18 minutes |
| Mobility Platform | Tracked / Wheeled Variants |
| Crew Required | 3 personnel |
| C2 System | Integrated IADS or Autonomous Mode |
| Connectivity | Secure Data Link (Russian Systems) |
| Network Capability | Yes |
| Operation Mode | Automatic / Semi-automatic / Manual |
| Primary Operator | Russia, Export Customers (Selected) |
| Combat Proven | Limited (Training & Demonstrations) |
| Conflict History | Not Publicly Detailed |
| Notable Feature | 16-missile load and high automation |
Russia’s Tor-E2 is one of the most modern short-range air defense (SHORAD) systems in the Russian arsenal, engineered to counter the rapidly evolving threat of drones, precision-guided munitions, and low-flying aircraft. Developed by Almaz-Antey, the Tor-E2 is an upgraded, export-oriented variant of the well-known Tor family, offering improved detection range, faster reaction time, and enhanced multi-target engagement—making it increasingly relevant in modern contested airspaces.
The Tor-E2 is built on a tracked or wheeled chassis, giving it high mobility across varied terrain. Its core mission is short-range protection for armored units, key installations, command posts, and critical infrastructure. The system features a fully automated engagement process, allowing the crew to detect, track, classify, and fire without manual intervention.
Tor-E2’s radar can detect targets at extended ranges and track up to 48 aerial objects simultaneously, while engaging four targets at once. The system carries 16 missiles (double the load of earlier Tor variants), eliminating the need for frequent reloading during intense operations. Its missiles can intercept targets flying at speeds up to Mach 2+, including small drones with low radar signatures—a crucial feature amid rising UAV warfare trends.
Russia markets the Tor-E2 to foreign customers seeking a low-altitude defense solution capable of operating autonomously or within a broader integrated air defense network. While Russia has showcased the system in various military exhibitions, its operational deployments are typically associated with Russian and allied forces requiring reliable point defense coverage.
The Tor-E2 is not used by the United States, but estimated export prices range between USD 25–35 million per unit, depending on configuration, mobility platform, and support packages.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More