

| Name | MiG-41 (PAK DP) |
| Manufacturer | Mikoyan Design Bureau |
| Country of Origin | Russia |
| Type / Role | Long-range interceptor |
| Generation | 6th (Projected) |
| Status | Under development |
| First Flight | Expected late 2028 |
| Introduction / In Service Since | Estimated early 2030s |
| Number Built | Prototype phase |
| Operators | Russian Aerospace Forces |
| Length | ~70 ft (21.3 m) |
| Wingspan | ~46 ft (14 m) |
| Height | ~18 ft (5.5 m) |
| Wing Area | Classified |
| Empty Weight | Approx. 38,000 kg |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 80,000 kg |
| Internal Weapons Bay | Yes |
| External Hardpoints | 6 (optional) |
| Maximum Speed | Mach 4.3 |
| Range | 1,200–1,500 miles |
| Combat Radius | 700 miles |
| Service Ceiling | 100,000 ft (30+ km) |
| Rate of Climb | 20,000 m/min (est.) |
| Thrust-to-Weight Ratio | 1.35+ |
| G Limits | +9 / -3 |
| Engine Type | Turbofan with ramjet assist |
| No. of Engines | 2 |
| Thrust (each) | 40,000+ lbf (est.) |
| Thrust Vectoring | Yes |
| Fuel Capacity | Classified |
| Gun | TBD |
| Missiles (Air-to-Air) | R-37M, new hypersonic variants |
| Missiles (Air-to-Ground) | Limited capability |
| Bombs | None (interceptor only) |
| Hardpoints | 6 internal/external |
| Payload Capacity | ~8,000 kg |
| Radar | AESA radar |
| Radar Range | 400+ km |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) System | Integrated |
| Targeting System | IRST + AI-assisted |
| Helmet Display | Advanced HMD |
| Navigation | Inertial + satellite |
| Autopilot / AI Assistance | Yes |
| Communication | Secure data-link capable |
| Radar Cross Section (RCS) | <0.1 m² (est.) |
| Stealth Features | Radar-absorbent coating, internal bays |
| Infrared Signature Reduction | Engine shielding, cooling ducts |
| Sensor Fusion | Multi-sensor integration |
| Networking Capabilities | Real-time datalink |
| Special Export Versions | - |
| Major Conflicts / Deployments | None (under development) |
| Notable Operators | Russia (planned) |
| Combat Proven? | No |
| Mission Types | Interception, air defense, anti-satellite |
| Unit Cost | $90–120 million (estimated) |
| Development Cost | $5–7 billion (projected) |
| Program Name | PAK DP |
| Funding Countries | Russia |
| Upgrades Planned | AI-assisted targeting, drone control |
| Future Replacement | MiG-31 Foxhound |
| Export Restrictions | Likely limited |
| Notable Achievements | Proposed Mach 4+ interceptor |
| Competitors | SR-72 (US), F-15EX (partial role) |
The MiG-41, also known as PAK DP (Prospective Air Complex for Long-Range Interception), represents Russia’s ambitious leap into sixth-generation fighter technology. Developed by the Mikoyan Design Bureau, the MiG-41 is envisioned as a high-speed stealth interceptor capable of replacing the aging MiG-31 Foxhound. Its development reflects Moscow’s strategic intent to secure air dominance in the Arctic and defend against next-generation threats such as hypersonic weapons and low-orbit reconnaissance systems.
Engineered for Mach 4.3 speeds, the MiG-41 is expected to employ advanced ramjet or scramjet propulsion, enabling operations in near-space altitudes above 30 km. Built with radar-absorbent materials and a reduced radar cross-section, it will combine stealth with unmatched speed and altitude performance. The aircraft’s AI-assisted avionics suite, AESA radar, and sensor fusion systems aim to detect and engage stealth aircraft, drones, and ballistic missiles beyond visual range.
The MiG-41’s arsenal will likely include hypersonic R-37M or new-generation long-range air-to-air missiles, and potentially anti-satellite weapons. Its internal weapons bay will reduce radar signature, while modern electronic warfare (EW) systems enhance survivability. Designed as a long-range interceptor, it prioritizes strategic defense missions rather than multirole flexibility.
While official figures are undisclosed, defense analysts estimate the MiG-41’s unit cost could exceed $90–120 million, placing it in the same category as Western fifth-generation fighters like the F-22 and F-35.
The official cost of the MiG-41 is not publicly disclosed. Analysts estimate a unit price between $90–120 million, making it comparable to other advanced Western fighters like the F-22 and F-35. Development costs are projected in the $5–7 billion range.
The MiG-41 is still under development. The first flight is expected around 2028, with potential operational service entering the early 2030s. Timelines could shift due to technical challenges in achieving Mach 4+ speeds and near-space operations.
Designed as a high-altitude interceptor, the MiG-41 is expected to operate at altitudes above 100,000 feet (30 km). This allows it to engage hypersonic targets, reconnaissance satellites in low Earth orbit, and other high-altitude threats.
Yes. The MiG-41 is intended as the successor to the MiG-31 Foxhound, offering superior speed, stealth, and advanced avionics. While the MiG-31 will remain in limited service for some time, the MiG-41 will eventually take over the strategic air defense and high-speed interception roles.
The MiG-41 exists as a confirmed development project by the Mikoyan Design Bureau. While prototypes are not yet publicly flown, Russian officials have repeatedly confirmed its design and objectives. It remains under development with projected flights in the late 2020s.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More