




| System Name | Zumwalt class destroyer |
| Type / Role | Stealth guided missile destroyer |
| Manufacturer | General Dynamics Bath Iron Works |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2016 |
| Unit Cost | Approx. USD 4.4 billion |
| Crew | Around 140 personnel |
| Length | 190 meters |
| Beam (Width) | 24.6 meters |
| Draft | 8.4 meters |
| Displacement | Approx. 15,000 tons |
| Hull Material | Steel hull with composite superstructure |
| Deck Configuration | Stealth integrated deckhouse |
| Propulsion Type | Integrated electric propulsion |
| Engine Model | 2 × Rolls Royce MT30 gas turbines |
| Power Output | Approx. 78 megawatts |
| Maximum Speed | Over 30 knots |
| Range | Over 4,500 nautical miles |
| Endurance | Extended deployments with resupply |
| Primary Radar | AN/SPY-3 AESA radar |
| Radar Range | Classified |
| Sonar System | Bow mounted and towed array sonar |
| Electro-Optical / IR System | Installed |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | Advanced integrated EW |
| Fire Control Radar | Multi function radar system |
| Main Gun | 2 × 30 mm Mk 46 guns |
| Vertical Launch System (VLS) Cells | 80 peripheral cells |
| Missiles | Tomahawk, SM series |
| Anti-Ship Missiles | Planned hypersonic strike weapons |
| Anti-Submarine Torpedoes | Yes |
| Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) | Limited |
| Decoy Systems | Chaff and electronic decoys |
| Helicopter Capability | Yes |
| Hangar Capacity | 2 helicopters |
| UAV Operations | Supported |
| Flight Deck Size | Large aft flight deck |
| Replenishment at Sea | Supported |
| Countermeasures | Chaff and soft kill systems |
| ECM / ECCM | Advanced |
| Missile Defense System | Limited capability |
| Combat Management System | Total Ship Computing Environment |
| Communication Systems | Secure U.S. Navy networks |
| Service Branch | United States Navy |
| Primary Operator | United States |
| Operational History | Active service and modernization |
| Notable Feature | Stealth hull and electric propulsion |
The Zumwalt class destroyer represents one of the most unconventional surface combatants ever built for the U.S. Navy. Designed to operate close to hostile shores, it focuses on stealth, automation, and advanced power systems rather than traditional fleet air defense.
Developed by General Dynamics Bath Iron Works with support from Huntington Ingalls Industries, the Zumwalt class originated in the United States as part of the DDG 1000 program. Its primary mission is surface strike, land attack, and support of joint forces in contested littoral environments. The ship’s distinctive tumblehome hull and composite deckhouse sharply reduce radar signature, making it difficult to detect at long range.
The destroyer uses an integrated power system that generates electricity for propulsion, sensors, and weapons from the same source. This design supports future systems such as high energy lasers or railguns. Automation allows the ship to operate with a much smaller crew than earlier destroyers.
Originally armed with Advanced Gun Systems for long range naval fire support, the class has since shifted toward missile focused roles. Its peripheral vertical launch system improves survivability by spacing missile cells around the hull rather than concentrating them in one area.
Only three Zumwalt class destroyers were built, all serving with the U.S. Navy. They are now being upgraded to carry hypersonic strike weapons, reinforcing their role as high value surface strike platforms rather than general purpose escorts.
The Zumwalt class destroyer is among the most expensive surface combatants ever constructed for the U.S. Navy. Each unit cost exceeds several billion U.S. dollars, reflecting its experimental technologies, limited production run, and ongoing modernization efforts. The program emphasizes capability demonstration rather than mass deployment.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More