| Name / Designation | Xingkong‑2 (Starry Sky‑2) |
| Type | Hypersonic waverider / glide vehicle |
| Manufacturer | China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics (CAAA) / CASC |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Role / Purpose | Hypersonic strike vehicle — regional strike / anti‑ship / potential nuclear strike / kinetic kill |
| Operational Status | Experimental / prototype / test phase |
| Length | Not publicly disclosed |
| Body Design | Wedge-shaped “waverider” airframe for shockwave lift |
| Material | Presumed high-temperature composites and heat-resistant alloys |
| Launch Platform | Rocket booster / multistage solid-fuel rocket |
| Payload Capacity | Not publicly disclosed — conventional or nuclear potential |
| Propulsion Type | Rocket booster for launch; aerodynamic gliding during flight |
| Speed | Mach 5.5–6 (test‑verified) |
| Range | Estimated 660–720 km glide range |
| Maneuverability | High — capable of large-angle turns and trajectory adjustments |
| Flight Profile | Boost phase via rocket, separation, then hypersonic atmospheric glide |
| Guidance System | Not publicly disclosed; likely inertial navigation system |
| Terminal Guidance | Unknown / unverified |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Not publicly disclosed |
| Counter-Jamming | Unknown — no verified data on electronic protection |
| Warhead Type | Potential conventional or nuclear payload; kinetic kill capability possible |
| Explosive Yield | Not publicly disclosed |
| Penetration Ability | High-speed kinetic impact may penetrate defenses, unverified |
| Thermal Protection | Advanced heat-resistant composites for hypersonic flight |
| Stealth Features | Not publicly disclosed |
| Anti-Interception Ability | High: unpredictable glide path, extreme speed, altitude maneuvers complicate missile defense |
The Xingkong-2 — known in English as “Starry Sky‑2” — represents a leap in hypersonic glide‑vehicle (HGV) technology, combining shock‑wave generated lift with extreme speed and maneuverability to challenge current missile defenses. Designed by the China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics (CAAA) under the auspices of China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), this experimental waverider showcases China’s ambition to field a next‑generation strike vehicle.
Launched via a rocket booster, Xingkong‑2 separates at high altitude, then transitions to a hypersonic glide profile — using its wedge-shaped “waverider” design to ride shockwaves and sustain lift at extreme speeds. During its first publicly acknowledged test in August 2018, the vehicle ascended to approximately 30 km altitude and sustained Mach 5.5 to Mach 6 for several minutes, reaching speeds of roughly 7,344 km/h.
Although official details remain limited, analysts project a glide range of roughly 660–720 km for Xingkong‑2 under certain conditions — enough for regional strike or anti-ship missions. Its maneuverable flight path, high speed, and atmospheric glide profile make interception by traditional missile‑defense systems extremely challenging.
In future operational use, Xingkong‑2 could carry either conventional or nuclear payloads, or serve as a kinetic‑kill vehicle — enhancing its versatility in a variety of strike scenarios.
Because Xingkong-2 is a military weapon system developed and maintained by the Chinese state, it is not available commercially for sale — hence there is no public “price” in the United States or global defense market.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More