


| System Name | Type 45 Daring-class Destroyer |
| Type / Role | Air-Defense Destroyer |
| Manufacturer | BAE Systems |
| Country of Origin | United Kingdom |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2009 |
| Unit Cost | ~1 billion USD |
| Crew | 190 |
| Length | 152.4 m |
| Beam (Width) | 21.2 m |
| Draft | 7.4 m |
| Displacement | 8,000 tons |
| Hull Material | Steel |
| Deck Configuration | Flight deck for helicopters |
| Propulsion Type | Integrated Electric Propulsion (IEP) |
| Engine Model | Rolls-Royce WR-21 gas turbine + diesel generators |
| Power Output | 53,000 hp |
| Maximum Speed | 29+ knots |
| Range | 7,000 nautical miles |
| Endurance | 45+ days |
| Primary Radar | SAMPSON Multi-Function Radar |
| Radar Range | 400 km (S1850M) |
| Sonar System | Type 2087 Towed Array |
| Electro-Optical / IR System | SELEX IRST |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | Integrated EW Suite |
| Fire Control Radar | S1850M |
| Main Gun | 4.5-inch Mark 8 |
| Vertical Launch System (VLS) Cells | 48 (Sea Viper) |
| Missiles | Aster 15/30 |
| Anti-Ship Missiles | Harpoon |
| Anti-Submarine Torpedoes | Sting Ray |
| Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) | Phalanx |
| Decoy Systems | Seagnat / Nulka |
| Helicopter Capability | Lynx / Wildcat |
| Hangar Capacity | 1 |
| UAV Operations | Limited |
| Flight Deck Size | Standard destroyer pad |
| Replenishment at Sea | Supported |
| Countermeasures | Decoys, chaff, flares |
| ECM / ECCM | Integrated EW Suite |
| Missile Defense System | Sea Viper / Aster |
| Combat Management System | PAAMS |
| Communication Systems | Secure naval communications |
| Service Branch | Royal Navy |
| Primary Operator | United Kingdom |
| Operational History | Fleet air-defense, carrier escort |
| Notable Feature | Advanced integrated radar and missile system |
The Type 45 Daring-class destroyer, also known as the Daring class, represents one of the most advanced air-defense warships in the Royal Navy. Designed for modern naval combat, it combines speed, firepower, and state-of-the-art sensors to protect fleets against aerial, surface, and submarine threats.
Built by BAE Systems in the United Kingdom, the Type 45 entered service in 2009 as a successor to the Type 42 destroyers. The vessel was developed primarily for air-defense operations, supporting fleet protection and strategic naval missions worldwide.
The Daring class features a displacement of 8,000 tons and can reach speeds of over 29 knots, powered by a sophisticated integrated electric propulsion system. Its operational range extends to approximately 7,000 nautical miles, enabling extended deployments without frequent refueling. Endurance is optimized for sustained maritime operations.
The destroyer is armed with the 4.5-inch Mark 8 naval gun, Sea Viper (PAAMS) vertical launch missiles, and anti-ship missiles such as the Harpoon. For close-in defense, it carries the Phalanx CIWS and torpedo launchers. The ship employs the advanced SAMPSON multi-function radar, combined with S1850M long-range radar, for air and surface threat detection. Electronic warfare and decoy systems enhance survivability against modern threats.
The Type 45 serves as a fleet air-defense platform, escorting aircraft carriers and protecting maritime task forces. It is capable of operating helicopters and UAVs for reconnaissance and anti-submarine warfare. Its integrated combat management system allows rapid response to complex threat environments.
The Type 45 Daring‑class destroyer has a unit build cost of about 1.05 billion UK pounds per ship when including research and development. In US dollars that works out to roughly around 1 billion USD per vessel, depending on current exchange rates.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More