


| System Name | Type 03 Chu-SAM Kai |
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi Heavy Industries / Mitsubishi Electric |
| Country of Origin | Japan |
| Type / Role | Medium-Range Surface-to-Air Missile System |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2014 (Kai upgrade) |
| Unit Cost | USD 300–450 Million (Estimated per Battery) |
| Maximum Engagement Range | 60–70 km |
| Maximum Engagement Altitude | ~20 km |
| Target Types | Aircraft, Cruise Missiles, UAVs |
| Interception Probability | Seconds (Estimated) |
| Reaction Time | 120–150 km |
| Missile Type | Active Radar-Guided SAM |
| Missile Length | ~5 m (Estimated) |
| Missile Weight | ~300 kg (Estimated) |
| Warhead Type | Fragmentation |
| Warhead Weight | Mach 3+ |
| Radar Type | AESA Phased-Array Radar |
| Radar Name | 120–150 km |
| Detection Range | Multiple simultaneous targets |
| Tracking Capacity | Inertial + Active Radar Homing |
| Guidance System | Automated Digital C2 System |
| Launcher Type | Mobile Truck-Mounted |
| No. of Missiles per Launcher | 6–8 (Estimated) |
| Reload Time | Under 1 hour |
| Mobility Platform | Mobile, truck-based platforms |
| Crew Required | 3–5 personnel |
| C2 System | Integrated Air Defense Network |
| Connectivity | Secure Digital Data Links |
| Network Capability | Yes |
| Operation Mode | Networked / Semi-Autonomous |
| Primary Operator | Japan |
| Combat Proven | No |
| Notable Feature | Balanced Medium-Range Defense |
The Type 03 Chu-SAM Kai missile defense system represents Japan’s advanced approach to modern, layered air defense. Developed to replace older short- and medium-range surface-to-air missile systems, Chu-SAM Kai is optimized to counter fast-moving aerial threats in contested airspace, including aircraft, cruise missiles, and unmanned aerial systems.
Manufactured by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries with key electronics supplied by Mitsubishi Electric, the system originates from Japan and serves the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force (JGSDF). The “Kai” upgrade significantly enhances range, reaction time, and network-centric warfare capability compared to the original Type 03 configuration. Its primary role is medium-range air defense for critical infrastructure, military bases, and maneuver forces.
Chu-SAM Kai employs an AESA-based phased-array radar, enabling rapid target detection, tracking, and engagement in all weather conditions, day or night. The interceptor missile is believed to reach Mach 3+ speeds, allowing effective engagement of agile and low-flying threats. With an estimated engagement range of 60–70 km and an interception altitude of up to 20 km, the system bridges the gap between short-range SHORAD and long-range strategic missile defenses.
The system is fully mobile, mounted on high-mobility trucks, allowing rapid redeployment. It integrates seamlessly with Japan’s broader air defense network, supporting cooperative engagement and data sharing with other sensors and command systems.
Operational since the mid-2010s, the Type 03 Chu-SAM Kai enhances Japan’s homeland air defense posture amid increasing regional missile and air activity. While not combat-proven, it is considered a technologically mature and reliable system within allied defense planning.
A full Chu-SAM battery, which includes radar, fire-control systems, multiple launchers, and missiles (standard Type 03 rather than “Kai” upgrade), has been estimated at approximately USD 160–175 million per battery (radar, fire control, 6 launchers, and ~72 missiles).
Older open-source data for the non-Kai variant also lists a cost of around 47 billion Japanese Yen per battery, which converts to roughly USD 350–400 million depending on exchange rates and configuration.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More