


| Name | Tu-95 Bear |
| Manufacturer | Tupolev Design Bureau |
| Country of Origin | Russia (formerly USSR) |
| Introduction / In Service Since | 1956 / Yes |
| Status | Active |
| Category | Long-range strategic bomber |
| Crew | 7 |
| Unit Cost | Estimated $50–60 million (varies) |
| Length | 151 ft |
| Wingspan | 164 ft |
| Height | 40 ft |
| Wing Area | 2,000+ sq ft |
| Empty Weight | ~90,000 lb |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | ~410,000 lb |
| Maximum Speed | ~440 knots (510 mph) |
| Range | ~9,400 miles |
| Combat Radius | ~3,500+ miles |
| Service Ceiling | 45,000 ft |
| Rate of Climb | ~2,000 ft/min |
| Engine Type | 4 × Kuznetsov NK-12 turboprops |
| Thrust (per engine) | ~15,000 shp |
| Total Thrust | ~60,000 shp |
| Internal Payload Capacity | ~15,000 kg |
| Weapons Bay | Cruise missiles, bombs |
| Compatible Weapons | Kh-55, Kh-101/102, conventional bombs |
| Hardpoints | Limited external pylons |
| Radar System | Obzor-MS (modern variants) |
| Navigation | Digital/GLONASS-compatible |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) | Updated ECM/ECCM suites |
| Stealth Features | None |
| Primary Operator | Russia |
| Conflict Usage | Cold War patrols, Syria (limited support) |
| Notable Missions | Global nuclear deterrence patrols |
| Variants | Tu-95MS, Tu-95MSM, Tu-142 (maritime) |
| Successor / Future Replacement | PAK DA (planned) |
| Notable Features | Fastest prop-driven bomber; extreme range |
| Estimated Operational Life | Into the 2040s with upgrades |
The Tu-95 “Bear” remains one of the most recognizable long-range strategic bombers in military aviation, notable for its distinctive turboprop engines and exceptional endurance. Developed by Tupolev during the early Cold War, the aircraft was designed to deliver nuclear and conventional payloads across intercontinental distances, giving the Soviet Union—and later Russia—a persistent strategic strike platform. Despite entering service in the mid-1950s, the Tu-95 has undergone multiple upgrades that allow it to remain operational today.
Powered by four Kuznetsov NK-12 turboprop engines, the aircraft is among the fastest propeller-driven aircraft ever built, capable of reaching speeds near 440 knots while carrying a substantial weapons load. Its swept-wing design and long-range fuel capacity allow it to perform extended patrols, maritime strike missions, and nuclear deterrence operations. The platform typically carries air-launched cruise missiles such as the Kh-55, Kh-101, and Kh-102, enabling stand-off precision strikes far from hostile air defenses.
The latest variants, including the Tu-95MS and Tu-95MSM, incorporate digital avionics, improved navigation systems, and upgraded weapons interfaces. The bomber continues to play a central role in Russia’s strategic bomber fleet, conducting long-range patrols over the Arctic, Pacific, and European regions. It also supports nuclear triad deterrence missions under Russia’s long-range aviation command.
While Russia does not publish export pricing and the bomber is not available for foreign sale, Western defense analysts estimate the Tu-95’s modernized unit cost to exceed $50–60 million, depending on configuration and upgrade package assessments.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More