


| Name | KC-135R Stratotanker |
| Manufacturer | Boeing |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Introduction / In Service Since | 1957 / 1960s |
| Status | Active |
| Category | Aerial Refueling Tanker |
| Crew | 3 |
| Unit Cost | Program dependent (upgrade based) |
| Length | 136 ft (41.5 m) |
| Wingspan | 130 ft 10 in (39.9 m) |
| Height | 41 ft 8 in (12.7 m) |
| Wing Area | 2,433 sq ft |
| Empty Weight | 104,000 lb |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 322,500 lb |
| Maximum Speed | 530 mph |
| Range | 1,500+ miles |
| Combat Radius | Mission dependent |
| Service Ceiling | 50,000 ft |
| Rate of Climb | Approx. 6,000 ft per min |
| Engine Type | 4 × CFM56-2 turbofans |
| Thrust (per engine) | 22,000 lbf |
| Total Thrust | 88,000 lbf |
| Internal Payload Capacity | Up to 200,000 lb fuel |
| Weapons Bay | None |
| Compatible Weapons | None |
| Hardpoints | None |
| Radar System | Weather and navigation radar |
| Navigation | INS, GPS |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) | Limited defensive systems |
| Stealth Features | None |
| Primary Operator | United States Air Force |
| Conflict Usage | Vietnam, Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan |
| Notable Missions | Global aerial refueling operations |
| Variants | KC-135R, KC-135T |
| Successor / Future Replacement | KC-46 Pegasus |
| Notable Features | Flying boom refueling system |
| Estimated Operational Life | Into the 2030s |
The KC-135R Stratotanker is one of the most important support aircraft in U.S. military aviation. While it rarely grabs headlines, it quietly enables nearly every long range air combat mission flown by the U.S. Air Force and its allies. Designed for aerial refueling, the KC-135R extends the reach, endurance, and flexibility of fighters, bombers, and surveillance aircraft across the globe.
First introduced during the Cold War, the KC-135 fleet has proven remarkably adaptable. The R model represents the most common and capable variant in service today, upgraded with modern engines, avionics, and fuel efficiency improvements that keep it operational well into the modern era.
The KC-135 was originally developed by Boeing in the late 1950s, based on the company’s early jet transport designs. The KC-135R upgrade program replaced older turbojet engines with CFM56 turbofan engines, significantly improving performance, fuel economy, and noise levels. These upgrades were carried out through Boeing and partner contractors under U.S. Air Force programs.
The KC-135R cruises at high subsonic speeds and has an intercontinental range when operating without refueling offload. Its true value lies in its ability to transfer large amounts of fuel in flight, allowing combat aircraft to operate far beyond their normal limits. It supports both boom refueling and, with adapters, probe equipped aircraft.
The original unit cost of the KC-135 was low by modern standards, but current value is tied to sustainment and upgrades rather than new production. Operating and modernization costs remain far lower than fielding an entirely new tanker fleet, making the KC-135R a cost effective asset.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More