


| System Name | HQ-22 Air Defense System |
| Manufacturer | CASIC |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Type / Role | Medium-Range Surface-to-Air Missile System |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | Mid-2010s |
| Unit Cost | USD 300–500 Million (Estimated per Battery) |
| Maximum Engagement Range | ~170 km |
| Maximum Engagement Altitude | ~27 km |
| Target Types | Aircraft, UAVs, Cruise Missiles |
| Interception Probability | Moderate (Varies by target type) |
| Reaction Time | Seconds-level response |
| Radar Detection Range | ~250 km |
| Missile Type | HQ-22 SAM Missile |
| Missile Length | Approx. 7 m |
| Missile Weight | ~300–400 kg |
| Warhead Type | Fragmentation |
| Warhead Weight | Estimated 75–90 kg |
| Speed | ~Mach 3 |
| Radar Type | Phased-Array Engagement Radar |
| Radar Name | Unknown / Export Variant: FK-3 Radar |
| Detection Range | ~250 km |
| Tracking Capacity | Dozens of simultaneous targets |
| Guidance System | Semi-Active Radar Homing + Command Guidance |
| Fire Control System | Digital Automated Fire Control |
| Launcher Type | Mobile Truck-Mounted Launcher |
| No. of Missiles per Launcher | 4–6 |
| Reload Time | 30–60 minutes |
| Mobility Platform | 8×8 Military Truck |
| Crew Required | 3–5 Personnel |
| C2 System | Integrated Air Defense Network |
| Connectivity | Secure Digital Data Link |
| Network Capability | Yes |
| Operation Mode | Autonomous / Networked / Manual |
| Primary Operator | China, Serbia (Export Variant FK-3) |
| Combat Proven | Limited |
| Conflict History | Not widely documented |
| Notable Feature | Medium-Range Layered Defense Capability |
The HQ-22 Air Defence System, developed by China’s defense industry for medium- to long-range air defense missions, has rapidly emerged as one of the country’s most widely fielded surface-to-air missile platforms. Designed to counter modern threats—including aircraft, cruise missiles, UAVs, and select ballistic targets—the HQ-22 is frequently compared to systems like the American Patriot PAC-2 and the Russian Buk-M3, making it a notable asset in China’s layered air defense network.
Manufactured by CASIC (China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation), the HQ-22 was officially introduced into service in the mid-2010s. The system emphasizes affordability, mobility, and strong electronic countermeasure resistance. One of its defining features is its semi-active radar homing missile, supported by a phased-array tracking radar capable of simultaneously monitoring multiple targets. Engagement ranges vary by missile variant, with estimates suggesting 100–170 km for aerial targets and lower ranges for high-maneuver or low-signature threats.
The HQ-22 fills a critical role between short-range and long-range interceptors, providing regional air defense for key military installations, logistic hubs, and command infrastructure. Its truck-mounted design allows rapid redeployment and flexible battlefield positioning—an important feature for modern mobile warfare.
Equipped with frequency-agile radar, digital fire control, and network-capable command posts, the HQ-22 can operate autonomously or fully integrated into a wider air defense grid. While less sophisticated than Western high-tier interceptors, its balance of range, mobility, and cost-efficiency has attracted international attention, with Serbia among its notable export customers.
Overall, the HQ-22 represents China’s modern approach to defense modernization—offering a capable, scalable medium-range solution for complex airspace environments.
Although the HQ-22 is not available for U.S. acquisition, defense analysts estimate an export battery cost between USD 300–500 million, depending on configuration and support packages.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More