

| Ship Type | Aircraft Carrier |
| Class | Queen Elizabeth-class |
| Length | 284 m |
| Beam (Width) | 73 m |
| Flight Deck Width | 70 m |
| Draft | 11 m |
| Displacement (Full Load) | 65,000 tons |
| Propulsion Type | Gas Turbine |
| Powerplant | 2 × Rolls-Royce MT30 turbines |
| Shafts | 2 |
| Maximum Speed | 25+ knots |
| Range | 8,000+ nm |
| Endurance | 90 days at sea |
| Aircraft Launch System | STOVL, ski-jump |
| Catapult Type | N/A |
| Recovery System | Arrestor nets for F-35B vertical landings |
| Total Aircraft Capacity | 40 |
| Hangar Capacity | Full-length hangar |
| Aircraft Types Supported | Fighters, ASW helos, transport helos |
| Primary Radar | 3D air & surface surveillance |
| Navigation Radar | Standard naval navigation radar |
| Fire Control Radar | Supports air defense & CIWS |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | ESM, ECM, jammers |
| Communication Systems | SATCOM, Link-16, secure datalinks |
| CIWS | Phalanx |
| Short-Range SAMs | Sea Ceptor |
| Missile Launchers | Limited surface defense |
| Decoy Systems | Chaff, flares, electronic |
| Combat Management System | Integrated CMS |
| Combat Information Center (CIC) | Central command hub |
| Air Operations Center | Manages flight ops |
| Data Links | Tactical & satellite comms |
| Ship Crew | 1,600 personnel |
| Air Wing Personnel | 800 |
| Total Complement | 2,400 |
| Shipbuilder/Manufacturer | BAE Systems / UK Royal Navy |
| Construction Started | 2011 |
| Commissioned | 2019 |
| Estimated Cost | $6–7B |
Commissioned in 2019, the vessel is purpose-built to support a wide range of operations, from full-scale combat missions to humanitarian assistance. With a full-load displacement of 65,000 tons and a length of 284 meters, HMS Prince of Wales can accommodate a mixed air wing of up to 40 aircraft, including F-35B Lightning II stealth fighters, Merlin anti-submarine helicopters, and other rotary and fixed-wing assets.
Equipped with a short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) flight deck, the carrier uses advanced ski-jump technology to optimize aircraft launch operations. Its integrated command and control systems allow seamless coordination of air, surface, and subsurface operations, while a robust sensor suite—including radar, electronic warfare, and communication systems—ensures situational awareness in complex operational environments.
Defensive capabilities include Phalanx CIWS, Sea Ceptor short-range SAMs, and decoy launchers to counter aerial and missile threats. Propelled by dual Rolls-Royce marine gas turbines, HMS Prince of Wales achieves speeds exceeding 25 knots, with an endurance of up to 90 days at sea.
Operationally, the carrier has participated in multinational exercises and power projection missions worldwide, demonstrating interoperability with NATO allies and U.S. carrier strike groups. Its combination of air power, command capabilities, and survivability makes HMS Prince of Wales a critical asset for both national defense and coalition maritime operations.
The HMS Prince of Wales represents the pinnacle of British naval engineering and power projection. Built by BAE Systems and Babcock International at the Rosyth Dockyard in Scotland, this Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier serves as the centerpiece of the Royal Navy’s fleet, designed for global operations and rapid deployment of air power.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More