| Name / Designation | DF-27 Missile |
| Type / Role | Long-Range Strike / Strategic Missile |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Manufacturer | PLA Rocket Force / Chinese Defense Industry |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | Reported 2020s |
| Operational Status | Active (Unconfirmed Open Source) |
| Range | 5,000–8,000 km (Estimated) |
| Speed | Hypersonic (Estimated Mach 5+) |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | Midcourse High-Altitude Flight |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Unknown / Unreleased |
| Warhead Type | Nuclear or Conventional |
| Guidance System | INS + Satellite Navigation (Assessed) |
| Targeting Mode | Midcourse Maneuvering / Non-Ballistic |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | Road-Mobile TEL |
| Seeker Type | Unreleased |
| Length | Not publicly disclosed |
| Diameter | Not publicly disclosed |
| Wingspan | N/A |
| Launch Weight | Not available (Classified) |
| Propulsion | Solid-Fuel Rocket |
| Warhead Weight | Unknown |
| Explosive Type | Nuclear / High-Explosive |
| Detonation Mechanism | Likely Impact or Proximity |
| Payload Options | Conventional / Nuclear |
| Operational Range Type | Long |
| Deployment Platform | Ground-Based TEL |
| Target Types | Strategic Targets, Naval Assets |
| Combat Proven | No |
| Users / Operators | China |
The DF-27 missile is one of China’s most discussed long-range strike systems, widely assessed by defense analysts as a new-generation hypersonic-capable missile designed for deep-strike missions across the Indo-Pacific region. Developed by the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF), the DF-27 bridges the gap between conventional intermediate-range ballistic missiles and maneuverable hypersonic glide systems, giving China an extended, flexible strike option that challenges modern missile defenses.
The DF-27 is believed to be a dual-capable missile capable of carrying conventional or nuclear warheads. Reports suggest a range exceeding 5,000 to 8,000 km, enabling it to hold distant regional and strategic targets at risk, including naval carrier groups and hardened land-based installations. Its potential midcourse maneuverability and non-ballistic flight profile distinguish it from traditional ballistic missiles, contributing to its survivability against advanced radar tracking networks.
While the Chinese government has not officially released technical data, open-source assessments indicate that the DF-27 likely uses a solid-fuel propulsion system, allowing rapid launch readiness and improved battlefield survivability. It may feature inertial navigation paired with satellite guidance, enabling long-range precision and more unpredictable trajectories compared to earlier missile classes.
Several U.S. defense sources have suggested the DF-27 might be capable of carrying a hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV), offering high terminal speeds and maneuverability to evade interceptors. This makes the missile strategically relevant in contested environments where traditional ballistic systems may face interception.
The DF-27 contributes to China’s expanding long-range strike doctrine, supporting anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) strategies and reinforcing deterrence across the Western Pacific. Although operational details remain closely guarded, the system is assessed to be active and deployed within PLARF units.
The DF-27 missile is not available for foreign military sale. Its cost is not publicly disclosed, but U.S. defense analysts estimate that comparable long-range hypersonic-capable systems would exceed tens of millions of dollars per unit, depending on deployment infrastructure and warhead configuration.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More