



| Vehicle Name | Challenger 3 |
| Type / Role | Main Battle Tank |
| Manufacturer | Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land |
| Country of Origin | United Kingdom |
| In Service | Entering service |
| Year Introduced | 2020s |
| Unit Cost | Approx. GBP 5.5 million |
| Crew | 4 |
| Length (Gun Forward) | 11.5 m |
| Width | 3.5 m |
| Height | 2.5 m |
| Weight | Approx. 66 tons |
| Ground Clearance | 0.5 m |
| Chassis Material | Steel with composite armor |
| Engine Type | Diesel |
| Engine Power | 1,200 hp |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | ~18 hp per ton |
| Transmission | Automatic |
| Maximum Speed (Road) | 59 km/h |
| Maximum Speed (Off-Road) | 40 km/h |
| Operational Range | 500 km |
| Suspension Type | Hydrogas |
| Main Gun | 120 mm L55A1 Smoothbore |
| Ammunition Capacity | 42 rounds |
| Secondary Armament | 12.7 mm MG, 7.62 mm MG |
| Gun Elevation/Depression | +20° / −10° |
| Fire Control System | Digital FCS |
| Stabilization | Dual-axis |
| Rate of Fire | 6 rounds per minute |
| Armor Type | Composite Modular Armor |
| Reactive Armor | Optional |
| Active Protection System (APS) | Provisioned |
| NBC Protection | Yes |
| Smoke Grenade Launchers | Yes |
| Fire Suppression System | Automatic |
| Mine Protection | Enhanced belly armor |
| Maximum Gradient | 60% |
| Side Slope | 40% |
| Trench Crossing | 2.8 m |
| Vertical Obstacle | 1.2 m |
| Fording Depth | 1.2 m |
| Turning Radius | Neutral turn |
| Amphibious Capability | No |
| Fire Control Computer | Yes |
| Thermal Imaging | Commander and gunner |
| Night Vision | Infrared |
| Laser Rangefinder | Yes |
| Ballistic Computer | Yes |
| Communication System | Secure digital radio |
| Battlefield Management System | Integrated |
| Service Branch | British Army |
| Primary Operator | United Kingdom |
| Combat Experience | None |
| Upgrade Packages | Challenger 3 |
| Export Status | Not exported |
| Production Status | Active upgrade program |
The Challenger 3 represents the United Kingdom’s most significant armored warfare upgrade in decades. Designed to keep British heavy armor credible well into the 2040s, the program transforms the legacy Challenger 2 into a fully modern main battle tank aligned with NATO standards.
Developed by Rheinmetall BAE Systems Land, Challenger 3 is a deep modernization rather than a clean-sheet design. The UK Ministry of Defence launched the program to address obsolescence in firepower, electronics, and survivability, lessons reinforced by recent high-intensity conflicts in Europe.
A key success story is the integration of a NATO-standard 120 mm smoothbore main gun. This change allows the British Army to share ammunition with U.S. and European allies, improving logistics and coalition readiness.
Challenger 3 replaces the older rifled gun with the 120 mm L55A1 smoothbore cannon, capable of firing advanced kinetic energy and multi-purpose rounds. A fully digital fire control system, commander and gunner thermal sights, and modern sensors improve first-round hit probability day or night.
Protection remains centered on advanced composite armor, with provision for modular upgrades and active protection systems. The platform retains a powerful diesel engine, providing solid mobility despite increased weight.
The tank is optimized for high-intensity combined arms combat, defensive operations, and deterrence missions in Europe. Challenger 3 ensures the British Army can operate alongside U.S. and NATO armored forces without capability gaps.
The Challenger 3 Main Battle Tank program is valued at roughly GBP 800 million for 148 upgraded vehicles. Per-unit costs vary due to refurbishment, new systems integration, training, and long-term support.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More