

| Name | A-12 Avenger II |
| Manufacturer | McDonnell Douglas / General Dynamics |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Introduction / In Service Since | Canceled (1991) |
| Status | Program Canceled |
| Category | Stealth Attack Aircraft |
| Crew | 2 |
| Unit Cost | USD 165–200 million (estimated) |
| Length | ~11.7 m (estimated) |
| Wingspan | ~21.3 m |
| Height | ~4.6 m |
| Wing Area | Classified / Estimated |
| Empty Weight | ~29,000 kg (estimated) |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | ~36,000 kg (estimated) |
| Maximum Speed | Subsonic |
| Range | Long-range |
| Combat Radius | ~1,500 km (estimated) |
| Service Ceiling | ~15,000 m (estimated) |
| Rate of Climb | Classified |
| Engine Type | 2 × Turbofan (planned) |
| Thrust (per engine) | Classified |
| Total Thrust | Classified |
| Internal Payload Capacity | ~5,800 kg |
| Weapons Bay | Internal |
| Compatible Weapons | Precision-guided bombs, anti-radiation weapons |
| Hardpoints | Internal only |
| Radar System | Advanced attack radar (planned) |
| Navigation | Integrated INS/GPS |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) | Integrated EW suite |
| Stealth Features | Low-observable airframe, RAM coatings |
| Primary Operator | U.S. Navy (planned) |
| Conflict Usage | None |
| Notable Missions | None (never deployed) |
| Variants | None operational |
| Successor / Future Replacement | F-35C Lightning II |
| Notable Features | Carrier-based flying-wing stealth design |
| Estimated Operational Life | N/A |
The A-12 Avenger II was an ambitious U.S. Navy stealth attack aircraft developed during the late Cold War to replace the A-6 Intruder. Although often labeled a “bomber,” the A-12 was designed as a carrier-based, all-weather, long-range stealth strike aircraft optimized for penetrating advanced air defenses.
Jointly developed by McDonnell Douglas and General Dynamics, the A-12 originated in the United States as part of the Navy’s Advanced Tactical Aircraft (ATA) program. Its primary mission was deep-strike operations against heavily defended targets, including surface-to-air missile sites, command centers, and naval targets, while operating from U.S. aircraft carriers.
The aircraft featured a flying-wing, triangular planform, similar in concept to later stealth bombers. Extensive use of radar-absorbent materials and internal weapons bays aimed to significantly reduce radar cross-section. Advanced avionics, integrated navigation/attack systems, and electronic countermeasures were planned to enable night and adverse-weather operations.
While never completed, projected specifications indicated subsonic speeds, long combat radius, and an internal payload suitable for precision-guided munitions, including laser-guided bombs and anti-radiation weapons. The A-12 was expected to carry all weapons internally to preserve stealth characteristics.
Despite its advanced concept, the A-12 Avenger II was canceled in 1991 due to cost overruns, weight growth, and schedule delays. The program remains one of the most notable canceled U.S. defense projects, influencing later stealth aircraft such as the B-2 Spirit and F-35 in terms of low-observable design philosophy.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More