

| Vehicle Name | M1A2 Abrams SEPv4 |
| Type / Role | Main Battle Tank |
| Manufacturer | General Dynamics Land Systems |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2024 (upgrade phase) |
| Unit Cost | USD 9 to 10 million |
| Crew | 4 |
| Length (Gun Forward) | 9.77 m |
| Width | 3.66 m |
| Height | 2.44 m |
| Weight | Approx. 67 tons |
| Ground Clearance | 0.48 m |
| Chassis Material | Composite armor and steel |
| Engine Type | Gas turbine |
| Engine Power | 1,500 hp |
| Power-to-Weight Ratio | Approx. 22 hp per ton |
| Transmission | Automatic cross drive |
| Maximum Speed (Road) | 67 km/h |
| Maximum Speed (Off-Road) | 40 km/h |
| Operational Range | 425 km |
| Suspension Type | Torsion bar |
| Main Gun | 120 mm M256 smoothbore |
| Ammunition Capacity | 42 rounds |
| Secondary Armament | 12.7 mm MG, 7.62 mm MGs |
| Gun Elevation/Depression | +20° / -10° |
| Fire Control System | Digital |
| Stabilization | Dual axis |
| Rate of Fire | 6 to 8 rpm |
| Armor Type | Composite with depleted uranium |
| Reactive Armor | Optional |
| Active Protection System (APS) | Trophy APS |
| NBC Protection | Yes |
| Smoke Grenade Launchers | 2 × 6 |
| Fire Suppression System | Automatic |
| Mine Protection | Reinforced belly |
| Maximum Gradient | 60 percent |
| Side Slope | 40 percent |
| Trench Crossing | 2.7 m |
| Vertical Obstacle | 1.2 m |
| Fording Depth | 1.2 m |
| Turning Radius | Neutral |
| Amphibious Capability | No |
| Fire Control Computer | Yes |
| Thermal Imaging | Commander and gunner |
| Night Vision | Infrared |
| Laser Rangefinder | Yes |
| Ballistic Computer | Yes |
| Communication System | Secure tactical |
| Battlefield Management System | Integrated |
| Service Branch | U.S. Army |
| Primary Operator | United States |
| Combat Experience | Iraq, Afghanistan |
| Upgrade Packages | SEPv3, SEPv4 |
| Export Status | Limited to allies |
| Production Status | Active |
The M1A2 SEPv4 Abrams is the latest evolution of the U.S. Army’s primary main battle tank, built to fight and survive in high threat environments. Designed around lessons from recent conflicts and future peer warfare, SEPv4 focuses on better sensing, improved lethality, and stronger protection against modern anti tank weapons.
Developed by General Dynamics Land Systems, the SEPv4 upgrade continues the Abrams modernization path that began during the Cold War. The program aims to keep the Abrams effective against near peer armored forces, drones, and guided munitions. It is not a new tank, but a deep upgrade that improves combat awareness and crew survivability.
The tank retains the proven 120 mm M256 smoothbore gun, compatible with advanced U.S. kinetic energy and multi purpose rounds. Improved fire control software and upgraded sensors allow crews to detect, identify, and engage targets at longer ranges, day or night. New thermal sights offer higher resolution, improving target recognition in cluttered battlefields.
SEPv4 uses enhanced composite armor with depleted uranium layers, combined with optional reactive armor. The integration of the Trophy active protection system gives the Abrams a proven defense against incoming rockets and missiles. Internal upgrades include better fire suppression and improved power management for onboard systems.
Powered by a 1,500 horsepower gas turbine engine, the Abrams maintains strong mobility despite its heavy weight. It is designed to lead armored formations, support mechanized infantry, and dominate direct fire engagements.
The M1A2 SEPv4 Abrams Main Battle Tank is estimated to cost around USD 9 to 10 million per unit, depending on configuration and upgrade scope.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More