| System Name | HQ-19 Missile Defense System |
| Manufacturer | China Aerospace Science & Technology Corp |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Type / Role | Long-Range Anti-Ballistic Missile System |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2010s (Estimated) |
| Unit Cost | Estimated USD 800M–1.2B per battery |
| Maximum Engagement Range | 1,000+ km |
| Maximum Engagement Altitude | Exo-atmospheric capability |
| Target Types | Ballistic Missiles, Space Threats |
| Interception Probability | Classified (estimated high against MRBM threats) |
| Reaction Time | 8–20 seconds |
| Radar Detection Range | 1,500+ km |
| Missile Type | HQ-19 Interceptor |
| Missile Length | Approx. 7–9 m |
| Missile Weight | Classified |
| Warhead Type | Kinetic Hit-to-Kill Vehicle |
| Warhead Weight | N/A (kinetic kill) |
| Speed | Mach 6+ |
| Radar Type | AESA Phased-Array Radar |
| Radar Name | Unspecified (Strategic Early Warning Radar) |
| Detection Range | 1,200–1,500+ km |
| Tracking Capacity | Dozens of ballistic targets simultaneously |
| Guidance System | Inertial + Radar Terminal Guidance |
| Fire Control System | Automated Digital Battle Management System |
| Launcher Type | Mobile, Truck-Mounted |
| No. of Missiles per Launcher | 1–2 Interceptors |
| Reload Time | 45–90 minutes |
| Mobility Platform | 8×8 Heavy Transporter |
| Crew Required | 3–5 Personnel |
| C2 System | Integrated Strategic C2 Network |
| Connectivity | Secure Digital Data Link |
| Network Capability | Yes |
| Operation Mode | Networked / Autonomous / Manual |
| Primary Operator | China |
| Combat Proven | No confirmed combat history |
| Conflict History | Not publicly documented |
| Notable Feature | Upper-tier exo-atmospheric interception |
The HQ-19 is one of China’s most advanced long-range missile defense systems, designed to counter ballistic missile threats and enhance strategic air-and-missile defense coverage. Developed by the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), the HQ-19 fills the upper-tier intercept role, functioning similarly in mission concept to systems like the U.S. THAAD. It represents China’s expanding investment in layered ballistic missile defense aimed at protecting high-value military and civilian infrastructure.
Built for intercepting medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, the HQ-19 relies on a combination of long-range tracking radars, hit-to-kill interceptors, and high-altitude engagement profiles. Although full performance data remains classified, open-source assessments indicate coverage extending hundreds of kilometers and engagement envelopes capable of exo-atmospheric interception.
At the heart of the HQ-19 system is a powerful AESA-based early warning and tracking radar network designed to detect incoming threats at long distances. The missile uses a high-velocity interceptor with a kinetic-kill vehicle, enabling it to neutralize ballistic threats in midcourse flight. The system integrates with China’s broader air-defense grid, improving situational awareness and multi-layer coverage.
The HQ-19 is deployed by the PLA Rocket Force and Air Force for strategic-level defense. Its mission focuses on countering ballistic missile attacks in regional scenarios, particularly in Western Pacific theaters. While combat use has not been publicly confirmed, its presence contributes significantly to China’s missile defense posture.
While the HQ-19 is not exported to the United States, equivalent U.S. systems like THAAD range between USD 800 million to 1.5 billion per battery, offering context for estimated cost comparisons.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More