


| Name | Bombardier CL-415 |
| Manufacturer | Bombardier Canadair |
| Country of Origin | Canada |
| Introduction / In Service Since | 1994 |
| Status | Active (limited production) |
| Category | Aerial Firefighting Aircraft |
| Crew | 2 |
| Unit Cost | $35–40 million |
| Length | 19.82 m |
| Wingspan | 28.60 m |
| Height | 9.13 m |
| Wing Area | 100 m² |
| Empty Weight | 12,880 kg |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 19,890 kg |
| Maximum Speed | 224 mph (360 km/h) |
| Range | 1,300 mi (2,092 km) |
| Combat Radius | N/A |
| Service Ceiling | 15,000 ft |
| Rate of Climb | 1,223 ft/min |
| Engine Type | 2 × PW123AF |
| Thrust (per engine) | 2,380 shp |
| Total Thrust | 4,760 shp |
| Internal Payload Capacity | 6,137 L water |
| Weapons Bay | None |
| Compatible Weapons | None |
| Hardpoints | None |
| Radar System | Civilian navigation radar |
| Navigation | GPS/INS suite |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) | None |
| Stealth Features | None |
| Primary Operator | Canada, France, Italy, Greece |
| Conflict Usage | Wildfire suppression |
| Notable Missions | Major wildfire responses globally |
| Variants | CL-415, CL-415EAF, CL-415GR |
| Successor / Future Replacement | DHC-515 (planned) |
| Notable Features | Amphibious scooping, rugged design |
| Estimated Operational Life | 30+ years |
The Bombardier CL-415 stands as one of the world’s most iconic and purpose-built aerial firefighting aircraft. Manufactured originally by Bombardier Aerospace (Canadair division), the CL-415 was developed as an upgraded successor to the widely used CL-215. Tailored for high-risk wildfire operations, it remains a cornerstone capability for several nations requiring rapid-response aerial firefighting platforms.
Designed specifically for amphibious “scooper” missions, the CL-415 can land on water, scoop up to 6,137 liters (1,621 gallons) of water in just 12 seconds, and deploy it directly onto fire zones. Its reinforced hull and excellent low-speed handling allow it to operate effectively in rugged, mountainous environments where wildfires often intensify. Powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW123AF turboprop engines, the aircraft achieves a maximum speed of 224 mph (360 km/h) and offers strong climb performance even in high-temperature conditions.
The CL-415’s operational range and endurance enable repeated water-drop cycles, making it invaluable during extended wildfire emergencies. With a crew of two, the aircraft integrates modern avionics, improved flight controls, and enhanced visibility for low-altitude, high-precision operations. While the CL-415 carries no weapons—given its civilian and disaster-response focus—it serves in additional support roles including search and rescue and maritime patrol in some countries.
Its global operators include Canada, France, Italy, Greece, and Croatia, each leveraging the aircraft’s reliability during peak wildfire seasons. Although Bombardier discontinued production, the program was transferred to Viking Air (De Havilland Canada), which continues to maintain and support the fleet under an updated version known as the CL-415EAF.
The Bombardier CL-415 typically ranges from $35 million to $40 million USD, depending on configuration, refurbishment level (for used units), and support packages. Newer upgraded variants, such as the CL-415EAF, may exceed this price range.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More