| Name | Su-27 “Flanker” |
| Manufacturer | Sukhoi Design Bureau |
| Country of Origin | Soviet Union (Russia) |
| Type / Role | Air Superiority Fighter |
| Generation | 4th Generation |
| Status | In Service |
| First Flight | May 20, 1977 |
| Introduction / In Service Since | 1985 |
| Number Built | Over 700 |
| Operators | Russia, China, Ukraine, Vietnam, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Belarus |
| Length | 21.9 m (72 ft) |
| Wingspan | 14.7 m (48 ft) |
| Height | 5.9 m (19 ft) |
| Wing Area | 62 m² |
| Empty Weight | 16,380 kg |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 30,450 kg |
| Internal Weapons Bay | None |
| External Hardpoints | 10 |
| Maximum Speed | Mach 2.35 (2,500 km/h) |
| Range | 3,530 km |
| Combat Radius | 1,340 km |
| Service Ceiling | 19,000 m (62,500 ft) |
| Rate of Climb | 325 m/s |
| Thrust-to-Weight Ratio | 1.07 |
| G Limits | +9G |
| Engine Type | Saturn AL-31F Turbofan |
| No. of Engines | 2 |
| Thrust (each) | 27,500 lbf (122.6 kN) |
| Thrust Vectoring | No (Su-27 base model) |
| Fuel Capacity | 9,400 kg internal |
| Gun | 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon |
| Missiles (Air-to-Air) | R-27, R-73, R-77 |
| Missiles (Air-to-Ground) | Kh-29, Kh-31 |
| Bombs | FAB-series general-purp |
| Hardpoints | 10 |
| Payload Capacity | 8,000 kg |
| Radar | N001 Myech Pulse-Doppler |
| Radar Range | 80–100 km |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) System | SPO-15 Beryoza RWR |
| Targeting System | IRST & Helmet-Mounted Sight |
| Helmet Display | Yes |
| Navigation | Inertial + GPS |
| Autopilot / AI Assistance | Basic analog system |
| Communication | Secure UHF/VHF |
| Radar Cross Section (RCS) | 10–15 m² |
| Stealth Features | Non |
| Infrared Signature Reduction | Minimal |
| Sensor Fusion | No |
| Networking Capabilities | Limited datalink |
| Special Export Versions | Su-27SK |
| Major Conflicts / Deployments | Ethiopia–Eritrea War, Ukraine conflict |
| Notable Operators | Russia, China, India (as Su-30MK), Ukraine |
| Combat Proven? | Yes |
| Mission Types | Air Superiority, Interception, Escort, Patrol |
| Unit Cost | $30–40 million USD |
| Development Cost | Classified (Soviet-era) |
| Program Name | PFI Program (Perspective Frontline Fighter) |
| Funding Countries | Soviet Union |
| Upgrades Planned | Radar and avionics modernization |
| Future Replacement | Su-35S, Su-57 |
| Export Restrictions | Limited to friendly nations |
| Notable Achievements | Set multiple world records for climb rate |
| Competitors | F-15 Eagle, MiG-29, Rafale |
Developed by the Soviet Union’s Sukhoi Design Bureau, the Su-27 “Flanker” remains one of the most capable and recognizable fourth-generation fighter jets in the world. Conceived in response to the U.S. F-15 Eagle during the late Cold War, the Su-27 was designed to ensure Soviet air superiority against advanced Western aircraft. Its blend of range, agility, and firepower continues to make it relevant in modern combat environments.
Powered by twin Saturn AL-31F turbofan engines, the Su-27 can reach speeds of Mach 2.35 and altitudes exceeding 57,000 feet. With an operational range of nearly 2,200 miles, it provides the Russian Air Force with deep strike and patrol capabilities. The aircraft’s 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon and up to 10 hardpoints for air-to-air and air-to-ground missiles make it a formidable adversary in both interception and multirole operations.
Avionics on the Su-27 Flanker Fighter Jet include the N001 radar, offering detection ranges of up to 80–100 km against fighter-sized targets. Its infrared search and track (IRST) system and helmet-mounted sight enhance situational awareness and missile cueing. Though lacking stealth, the Su-27’s aerodynamic design and supermaneuverability—achieved through relaxed static stability and powerful thrust vectoring in later variants—make it one of the most agile fighters of its era.
Modernized derivatives such as the Su-30, Su-33, and Su-35 trace their lineage to the original Su-27 platform, underscoring its robust design and long-term adaptability.
The Su-27 Flanker’s estimated unit cost is between $30–40 million USD, depending on configuration and export version. While not operated by the U.S., it is often studied by Western analysts and featured in training simulations for its performance benchmark role against American fighters like the F-15 and F-16.
Yes. The Su-27’s NATO reporting name is “Flanker”. This codename was assigned during the Cold War to identify Soviet aircraft in NATO’s system. The “Flanker” designation applies to the Su-27 and its subsequent derivatives, including the Su-30, Su-33, and Su-35.
The Su-30 is a direct evolution of the Su-27 airframe, which is why NATO also classifies it under the same “Flanker” family. Although upgraded with modern avionics, radar, and multirole capability, the Su-30 retains much of the Su-27’s aerodynamic structure and design lineage—hence its continued “Flanker” naming convention.
The Su-27 and F-15 Eagle were designed as counterparts during the Cold War. While the Su-27 offers superior maneuverability, range, and high-altitude performance, the F-15 generally holds an advantage in avionics, radar, and precision-guided weapon integration. In short, the Su-27 excels in agility and endurance, while the F-15 dominates in technology and situational awareness.
The most advanced “Flanker” variant today is the Su-35S, often dubbed “Flanker-E.” It features thrust-vectoring engines, Irbis-E radar, advanced electronic warfare systems, and partial stealth improvements. The Su-35S represents the peak of Su-27 family evolution before the introduction of Russia’s fifth-generation Su-57.
The Su-27 Flanker is a fourth-generation air superiority fighter. It was developed in the 1970s to counter advanced Western fighters like the F-14 and F-15, combining high speed, long range, and agility to maintain Soviet dominance in air-to-air engagements.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More